0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Quantitative Comparison Between Precision Closed-Die Forging-Force Data and Computer Simulations

[+] Author and Article Information
J. N. Majerus, K. P. Jen, H. Gong

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Villanova University, Villanova, PA 19085-1681

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 114(4), 465-471 (Oct 01, 1992) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2904200 History: Received June 28, 1991; Revised December 30, 1991; Online April 29, 2008

Abstract

This paper presents a study of precision closed-die, isothermal, forgings via both experiments and computer simulation. The closed-die cross-section was an “H” shape and Tin/Lead eutectic solder was used for the billet material. Extensive statistical analysis of the axial force versus displacement history was conducted using replicated forging experiments. The purpose of the experiment was to obtain statistically significant data so that accuracy tests could be conducted on different FEM computer models, e.g., ALPID, EPIC2D, NIKE2D, and DYNA2D. Overall, the forging history exhibited complex behavior consisting of five distinct regions. The experimental results yield a 5.2 percent COV in the required forging force for a specific top-die displacement. A 6.5 percent COV in the “stiffness” of the first region (elastic behavior) of the forging history was also obtained. One set of simulations with one FEM computer model, ALPID Version 2.1 for rigid-thermoviscoplastic behavior, was conducted. The occurrence of all four viscoplasticflow regions was qualitatively predicted by the simulations. Quantitatively, the simulations are within the experimental bounds for the early viscoplastic regions, but out of bounds for the later regions. It appears that, for the eutectic tin/lead billet material, there is no combination of “power-law” material parameters that yield good agreement with the later stages of the forging force history.

Copyright © 1992 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In