High Strain Extension of Open-Cell Foams

[+] Author and Article Information
N. J. Mills, A. Gilchrist

School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2IT, U.K.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 122(1), 67-73 (Apr 22, 1999) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.482767 History: Received August 20, 1998; Revised April 22, 1999
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
(a) xy projection of a triangular prism showing two sloping edges and two half horizontal edges, in both the undeformed and deformed states, for [111] direction extension of the Kelvin foam by 20%. G lies beneath and R above the plane of the projection (b) a perspective view of the force and moments applied at G to the edge CG.
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted Kelvin foam cell shape for 20% tensile strain in the [111] direction, seen in perspective with the stress axis vertical
Grahic Jump Location
Stress strain curve for a PU uphoistery foam of relative density 0.021, loaded in the plane of the sheet, cycled three times to 25% strain at a nominal strain rate of 0.005 s−1 . The Kelvin foam [111] predictions are [[dotted_line]] for equiaxed cells and [[dashed_line]] for cells with edges initially at 45 deg to the stress, using E=100 MPa for the polyurethane.
Grahic Jump Location
Lateral contraction in the rise – and in-plane [[dashed_line]] directions versus tensile strain for the same experiment as Fig. 8, for cycles 2 and 3
Grahic Jump Location
A uniaxial tensile stress σz applied in the [001] direction of a Kelvin open cell foam. Chains of edges, like those in bold, take the load.
Grahic Jump Location
(a) The structural cell for [001] direction tension of the Kelvin foam, (b) the effective load on the half-edge BO. Its shape is shown for 20% foam strain.
Grahic Jump Location
The predicted reduced stress-strain relation for the Kelvin foam loaded in the [001] and [111] directions, using Plateau border edges, plus Shulmeister’s 15 random cell prediction [[dashed_line]] with circular section edges, all for a relative density of 0.025
Grahic Jump Location
The maximum edge tensile strain versus the foam tensile strain, for the Kelvin foam extended in the [001] and [111] directions, with the same parameters as Fig. 3
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted variation of Poisson’s ratio with foam tensile strain, for the Kelvin foam loaded in the [001] and [111] directions as in Fig. 3, compared with El-Ratal and Mallick’s Poisson’s ratio data • 10 for a commercial PU foam (increased by 0.15 to make the comparison easier)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In