0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Inelastic Anisotropy of Inconel 718: Experiments and Mathematical Representation

[+] Author and Article Information
Saiganesh K. Iyer, Cliff J. Lissenden

Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 122(3), 321-326 (Mar 15, 2000) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.482804 History: Received November 02, 1999; Revised March 15, 2000
Copyright © 2000 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Leslie,  W. C., and Sober,  R. J., 1967, “The strength of ferrite and of martensite as functions of composition, temperature, and strain rate,” Trans. ASM,60, pp. 459–484.
Spitzig,  W. A., Sober,  R. J., and Richmond,  O., 1975, “Pressure dependence of yielding and associated volume expansion in tempered martensite,” Acta Metall., 23, pp. 885–893.
Eiselstein, H. L., 1965, “Metallurgy of a columbium-hardened nickel-chromium-iron alloy,” Advances in the Technology of Stainless Steels and Related Alloys, ASTM STP-369, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 62–79.
Huntington, 1968, “Inconel alloy 718,” Huntington Alloy Products Division, The International Nickel Co., Inc.
Sundararaman,  M., Mukhopadhyay,  P., and Banerjee,  S., 1988, “Deformation behaviour of γ″ strengthened Inconel 718,” Acta Metall., 36, pp. 847–864.
Worthem,  D. W., Robertson,  I. M., Leckie,  F. A., Socie,  D. F., and Altstetter,  C. J., 1990, “Inhomogeneous deformation in Inconel 718 during monotonic and cyclic loadings,” Metall. Trans., 21A, pp. 3215–3220.
Gil,  C. M., Lissenden,  C. J., and Lerch,  B. A., 1999, “Unusual nonlinear response of some metallic materials,” Mech. Mater., 31, pp. 565–577.
Gil,  C. M., Lissenden,  C. J., and Lerch,  B. A., 1999, “Determination of yield in Inconel 718 for axial-torsional loading at temperatures up to 649°C,” J. Test. Eval., 27, pp. 327–336.
Kalish,  D., and Cohen,  M., 1969, “Anisotropy of properties in martensite as developed by thermomechanical treatments,” Trans. ASM,62, pp. 353–361.
Hirth,  J. P., and Cohen,  M., 1970, “On the strength-differential phenomenon in hardened steel,” Metall. Trans., 1, pp. 3–8.
Drucker,  D. C., 1973, “Plasticity theory, strength-differential (SD) phenomenon, and volume expansion in metals and plastics,” Metall. Trans., 4, pp. 667–673.
Mannan,  S. L., and Rodriquez,  P., 1973, “Strength differential effect in zirconium alloys,” Scr. Metall., 7, pp. 1069–1074.
Olsen,  R. J., and Angell,  G. S., 1969, “The strength differential in two-phase alloys,” Trans. ASM,62, pp. 711–720.
Chait,  R., 1973, “The strength differential of steel and Ti alloys as influenced by test temperature and microstructure,” Scr. Metall., 7, pp. 351–354.
Pollock,  T., and Steif,  P. S., 1998, “PRET: A university-industry partnership for research and transition of gamma titanium aluminides,” Annual Report, Carnegie Mellon University.
Arnold,  S. M., and Saleeb,  A. F., 1994, “On the thermodynamic framework of generalized coupled thermoelastic-viscoplastic-damage modeling” Int. J. Plast., 10, pp. 263–278.
Ponter,  A. R. S., and Leckie,  F. A., 1976, “Constitutive relationships for the time-dependent plastic deformation in metals,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 98, pp. 47–51.
Arnold, S. M., Saleeb, A. F., and Castelli, M. G., 1996, “A fully associative, nonlinear kinematic, unified viscoplastic model for titanium based matrices,” Life Prediction Methodology for Titanium Matrix Composites, W. S. Johnson, J. M. Larson, and B. N. Cox, eds., ASTM STP-1253, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 231–256.
Lissenden,  C. J., Gil,  C. M., and Lerch,  B. A., 1999, “A methodology for determining rate-dependent flow surfaces for Inconel 718,” J. Test. Eval., 27, pp. 402–411.
Bridgman, P. W., 1952, Studies in large plastic flow and fracture, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Calloch,  S., and Marquis,  D., 1999, “Triaxial tension-compression tests for multiaxial cyclic plasticity,” Int. J. Plast., 15, pp. 521–549.
Drucker,  D. C., 1949, “Relation of experiments to mathematical theories of plasticity” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 16, pp. A349–357.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Tensile and compressive stress-strain responses of Inconel 718
Grahic Jump Location
Initial 30 μm/m yield surfaces for Inconel 718 at (a) 25°C and (b) 650°C. Symbols denote different specimens.
Grahic Jump Location
Threshold surface for Inconel 718 at 650°C (m=1/2, χ=1.96, σt=303 MPa,c=10−5MPa−1); (a) principal stress space, (b) loci in deviatoric planes for I1=−7800, −6300, −4800, −3300, −1800, −300 MPa
Grahic Jump Location
Effective stress paths with I1 changing—J2 and J3 constant
Grahic Jump Location
Effective stress paths with J2 changing—I1 and J3 constant
Grahic Jump Location
Effective stress paths with J3 changing—I1 and J2 constant
Grahic Jump Location
Stress path with I1 constant, J2 rate constant and J3 changing
Grahic Jump Location
Stress path with J3 constant, J2 rate constant and I1 changing
Grahic Jump Location
Effective stress invariants for two proportional loading paths

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In