Effective Models for Prediction of Springback In Flanging

[+] Author and Article Information
Nan Song, Dong Qian, Jian Cao, Wing Kam Liu

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208

Shaofan Li

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, SEMM Group, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 123(4), 456-461 (Jul 25, 2000) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1395019 History: Received July 25, 2000
Copyright © 2001 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Schematics of flanging processes
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of flange operation
Grahic Jump Location
Illustration of boundary conditions in the analytical model
Grahic Jump Location
Profile of det{M(x)} on a concave region
Grahic Jump Location
Contact between a slave node and a surface
Grahic Jump Location
Springback angle versus gap distance for 20 mm flange length
Grahic Jump Location
(a-b) Comparison of Lc by numerical and analytical method (a) gap=1.2 mm; (b) gap=2.0 mm
Grahic Jump Location
Angle comparison: simulation results versus experimental data. Different flange lengths and gaps are chosen (L11,g2.0 means: flange length is 11 mm and gap is 2.0 mm).




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In