0
RESEARCH PAPERS

Thermo-Mechanical Modeling of Hot Forging Process

[+] Author and Article Information
Siamak Serajzadeh

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11365-9466, Azadi Ave., Tehran, Iran

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 126(4), 406-412 (Nov 09, 2004) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1631029 History: Received November 22, 2002; Revised May 05, 2003; Online November 09, 2004
Copyright © 2004 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
True stress-strain curves obtained from (a) single stage experiments, (b) double stage experiments
Grahic Jump Location
Calculated and experimental stress-strain curves under isothermal and constant strain rates conditions for the low carbon steel
Grahic Jump Location
Calculated and experimental stress-strain curves under isothermal and constant strain rates conditions for the high silicon steel
Grahic Jump Location
Theoretical and experimental load-stroke results achieved under nonisothermal condition
Grahic Jump Location
High silicon steel austenite grain size after hot forging at 950°C and strain rate of 0.5 s−1 (a) true strain of 0.4, (b) true strain of 0.65
Grahic Jump Location
Predicted austenite grain size during and after hot nonisothermal forging for the high silicon steel
Grahic Jump Location
Progress of phase transformations for high silicon steel predicted by the model (a) dynamic recovery, (b) dynamic recrystallization, (c) static recrystallization
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of forging condition on temperature and strain heterogeneity during hot nonisothermal forging (sticking friction factor=0.5, reduction=32%) (a) ram velocity of 1 s/mm, (b) ram velocity of 40 s/mm
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of interface heat transfer coefficient on the shape of the final product in the process of hot nonisothermal forging (ram velocity=10 mm/s, sticking friction factor=0.4, reduction=40%) (a) interface heat transfer coefficient of 1500 w/m2 °C, (b) interface heat transfer coefficient of 8500 w/m2 °C
Grahic Jump Location
Effect of chemical composition on the developed strain field during the hot upset forging (ram velocity=10 mm/s, sticking friction factor=0.4, reduction=40%, and interface heat transfer coefficient=6000 w/m2 °C) (a) high silicon steel, (b) low carbon steel
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison between the predicted kinetics of dynamic phase transformations under nonisothermal upset forging for the two kinds of steel (a) dynamic recovery (b) dynamic recrystallization

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In