0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

An Investigation of the Effects of Microstructure on Fatigue Crack Growth in Ti-6242

[+] Author and Article Information
F. McBagonluri

Department of Materials Engineering, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH

E. Akpan

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA

C. Mercer

Materials Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA

W. Shen

Princeton Materials Institute, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

W. O. Soboyejo

Princeton Materials Institute, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 127(1), 46-57 (Feb 22, 2005) (12 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1836771 History: Received January 01, 2003; Revised September 14, 2004; Online February 22, 2005
Copyright © 2005 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Shankar, P., and Ravichandran, K. S., 2002, “Fatigue of Beta Annealed Ti-10V-2Fe-3Al Alloy: Effects of Aging and Mechanisms of Crack Nucleation,” Proc. Fatigue, A. F. Blom, ed., pp. 1789–1796.
Spence, S. H., Evans, W. H., and Cope, M., 1997, “Dwell Fatigue of Ti 6246 at Near Ambient Temperatures,” Advances in Fracture Research, 9th International Conference on Fracture, Sydney, Australia, 3 , Pergamon, pp. 1571–1578.
Ravichandran, K. S., Jha, S. K., and Shankar, P. S., 2002, “Fatigue of Beta Titanium Alloys: Crack Initiation, Growth and Fatigue Life,” in Proc. Fatigue, A. F. Blom, ed., EMAS, Warley, Cradley Heath, U.K., 3 , pp. 1751–1762.
Stroh,  A. N., 1954, Proc. Phys. Soc., London B 67, pp. 427–436.
Evans,  W. J., and Bache,  M. R., 1994, “Dwell-Sensitive Fatigue Under Biaxial Loads in the Near Alpha Titanium Alloy IMI685,” Int. J. Fatigue, 16, pp. 443–452.
Knott, J. F., 1973, Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics, Butterworth.
Peters,  J. O., Boyce,  B. L., Chen,  X., McNaney,  J. M., Hutchinson,  J. W., and Ritchie,  R. O., 2002, “On the Application of the Kitagawa-Takahashi Diagram to Foreign-Object Damage and High Cycle Fatigue,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 69, pp. 1425–1446.
Hicks,  M. J., and Pickard,  A. C., 1992, “A Comparison of Theoretical and Experimental Methods of Calibrating the Electrical Potential Drop Technique for Crack Length Determination,” Int. J. Fract., 20, pp. 91–101.
Suresh, S., 1991, Fatigue of Materials, Cambridge University Press, U.K.
Sinha,  V., Mercer,  C., and Soboyejo,  W. O., 2000, “An Investigation of Short and Long Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 287, pp. 30–42.
Soboyejo,  W. O., and Knott,  J. F., 1991, “The Propagation of Non-Coplanar Semi-Elliptical Fatigue Cracks,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 14(1), pp. 37–49.
Soboyejo,  W. O., Kishimoto,  K., Smith,  R. A., and Knott,  J. F., 1989, “Study of the Interaction and Coalescence of Two Coplanar Fatigue Cracks in Bending,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 12(6), pp. 167–174.
Soboyejo,  W. O., Reed,  R. C., and Knott,  J. F., 1990, “On the Calibration of the Direct Current Potential Difference Method for the Determination of Semi-Elliptical Crack Lengths,” Int. J. Fract., 44, pp. 27–41.
Soboyejo,  W. O., and Knott,  J. F., 1990, “Effects of Stress Ratio on Fatigue Crack Propagation in Q1N (HY80) Pressure Vessel Steel,” Int. J. Fatigue, 12, pp. 403–407.
Zhou,  J., and Soboyejo,  W. O., 2002, “An Investigation of the Effects of Crack Front Curvature on the Crack-Tip Opening Displacement of A707 Steel,” Int. J. Fract., 115(3), pp. 287–304.
Chesnutt, J., Thompson, A. W., and Williams, J. C., 1980, Titanium 80: Science and Technology, AIME, Warrendale, PA. p. 1875.
Yoder,  G. R., Cooley,  L. A., and Crooker,  T. W., 1977, “Observations on Microstructurally Sensitive Fatigue Crack Growth in a Widmanstatten Ti-6A1-4V Alloy,” Metall. Trans. A, 8, p. 1737.
Yoder,  G. R., and Eylon,  D., 1979, “On the Effect of Colony Size on Fatigue Crack Growth in Widmanstatten Structure Alpha+Beta Alloys,” Metall. Trans. A, 10(11), pp. 1808–1810.
Ravichandran,  K. S., 1991, “Near Threshold Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior of a Titanium Alloy: Ti-6A1-4V,” Acta Metall., 39, pp. 401–410.
Shademan, S., 2000, “Mechanism-Based Models of Fatigue Crack Growth,” Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Sinha, V., 1999, “Effects of Microstructure on Fatigue Behavior of α/β Titanium Alloys,” Ph.D. thesis, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Suresh,  S., 1985, “Fatigue Crack Deflection and Fracture Surface Contact: Micromechanical Models,” Metall. Trans. A, 16, pp. 249–260.
Sehitoglu,  H., and Garcia,  A. M., 1997, “Contact of Crack Surfaces During Fatigue,” Metall. Trans. A, 28, pp. 2263–2289.
Beevers,  C. J., and Halliday,  M. D., 1979, “Nonclosure of Cracks and Fatigue Crack Growth in β Heat-Treated Ti-6Al-4V,” Int. J. Fract., 15, pp. R27–R30.
Corn,  D. L., 1971, “A Study of Cracking Techniques for Obtaining Partial Thickness Cracks of Pre-Selected Depths and Shapes,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 3(1), pp. 45–46.
Soboyejo,  W. O., and Knott,  J. F., 1995, “An Investigation of Crack Closure and the Propagation of Semi-Elliptical Fatigue Cracks in Q1N (HY80) Pressure Vessel Steel,” Int. J. Fatigue, 17(8), pp. 577–581.
Jolles, M., and Tortoriello, V., 1983, “Geometric Variations During Fatigue Growth of Surface Flaws,” in Fracture Mechanics 14 ASTM STP 791, J. C. Lewis and G. Sines, eds., American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1-297–1-307.
Newman,  J. C., and Raju,  I. S., 1981, “An Empirical Stress Intensity Factor Equation for the Surface Crack,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 15, pp. 185–192.
Fleck,  N. A., Smith,  I. F. C., and Smith,  R. A., 1983, “Closure Behavior of Surface Cracks,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 6, pp. 225–239.
Taylor,  D., and Knott,  J. F., 1981, “Fatigue Crack Propagation Behaviour of Short Cracks: The Effect of Microstructure,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 4, p. 147.
Soboyejo, W. O., 2000, Mechanical Properties of Engineered Materials, Marcel Dekker Publishers, New York.
McClurg, R. C., Lawless, B. H., Gorelik, M., Gill, Y., and Piasak, R. S., 1999, “Fatigue Crack Growth of Titanium Rotor Alloys in Vacuum and Air,” Fatigue Behaior of Titanium Alloys, R. R. Boyer, D. Eylon and G. Lutjering, eds., The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, pp. 211–218.
Shademan,  S., and Soboyejo,  W. O., 2002, “An Investigation of Short Fatigue Crack Growth in Ti-6Al-4V With Colony Microstructures,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 335(1-2), pp. 116–127.
Mercer,  C., Shademan,  S., and Soboyejo,  W. O., 2003, “An Investigation of the Micromechanisms of Fatigue Crack Growth in Structural Gas Turbine Engine Alloys,” J. Mater. Sci., 38, pp. 291–305.
Hall,  J. A., 1997, “Fatigue Crack Initiation in Alpha-Beta Titanium Alloys,” Int. J. Fatigue, 19, pp. 23–37.
Boyce,  B. L., Ritchie,  R. O., Campbell,  J. P., Roder,  O., Thompson,  A. W., and Milligan,  W. W., 1999, “Threshold for High Cycle Fatigue in a Turbine Engine Ti-6Al-4V Alloy,” Int. J. Fatigue, 21, pp. 653–662.
Nakajima,  K., Terao,  K., and Miyata,  T., 1998, “The Effect of Microstructure on Fatigue Crack Propagation of _ Titanium Alloys,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 243, pp. 176–181.
Hu,  Y. M., Floer,  W., Krupp,  U., and Christ,  H. J., 2000, “Microstructurally Short Fatigue Crack Initiation and Growth in Ti-6.8Mo-4.5Fe-1.5A1,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 278, pp. 170–180.
Shen,  W., Soboyejo,  W. O., and Soboyejo,  A. B. O., 2004, “An Investigation of Fatigue and Dwell Fatigue Crack Growth in Ti-6Al-2Sn-4Zr-2Mo-0.1Si,” Mech. Mater. 36, pp. 117–140.
Dowling, N., 1993, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bhattacharya,  B., and Ellingwood,  B., 1998, “Continuum Damage Mechanics Analysis of Fatigue Crack Initiation,” Int. J. Fatigue, 20(9), pp. 631–639.
Demaid, A. P. A., and Lawley, A., 1986, “The Markham Mine Disaster,” Case Histories Involving Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics, ASTM STP 918, C. M. Hudson and T. P. Rich, Eds., American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 389–416.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Schematic illustration of the nucleation of cleavage fracture from dislocation pile-up at grain boundaries (taken from Ref. 6)
Grahic Jump Location
Ti-6242 microstructural morphologies: (a) equiaxed microstructure (microstructure 1); (b) elongated microstructure (microstructure 2); and (c) colony microstructure (microstructure 3)
Grahic Jump Location
Dimensions of smooth hourglass specimen
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic of beachmarking load profiles (a) pure fatigue waveform
Grahic Jump Location
Beachmarks on long through-thickness cracks in (a) equiaxed structure (microstructure 1); (b) elongated structure (microstructure 2); and (c) colony structure (microstructure 3)
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of long fatigue crack growth rate data obtained from SENB specimens
Grahic Jump Location
Fatigue fracture modes in microstructure 1: (a) subsurface crack nucleation; (b) crack growth by cleavage; (c) transition from cleavage to striation; (d) fatigue striations; (e) fatigue striation plus dimples; (f) final fracture
Grahic Jump Location
Fatigue fracture modes in microstructure 2: (a) subsurface crack nucleation; (b) crack growth by cleavage; (c) transition from cleavage to striation; (d) fatigue striations; (e) fatigue striation plus dimples; (f) final fracture
Grahic Jump Location
Fatigue fracture modes in microstructure 3: (a) subsurface crack nucleation; (b) crack growth by cleavage; (c) transition from cleavage to striation; (d) fatigue striations; (e) fatigue striation plus dimples; (f) final fracture
Grahic Jump Location
Possible crack profiles and crack shape parameters: (a) typical optical photomicrograph; (b) schematics of possible crack profiles
Grahic Jump Location
Plots of crack aspect ratio, (c/a), versus number of fatigue cycles: (a) equixed microstructure; (b) elongated microstructure; (c) colony microstructure
Grahic Jump Location
(a) Comparison of semielliptical and through thickness crack growth rate data obtained for microstructure 1; (b) comparison of semielliptical and through thickness crack growth rate data obtained for microstructure 2; (c) comparison of semielliptical and through thickness crack growth rate data obtained for microstructure 3
Grahic Jump Location
Schematic illustration of possible crack extension schemes: (a) surface crack from section; (b) subsurface initial crack; (c) surface crack in hourglass section
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of predicted and experimental depth crack evolution: (a) equiaxed microstructure; (b) elongated microstructure; (c) colony microstructure
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of predicted and experimental surface crack length evolution: (a) equixed microstructure; (b) elongated microstructure and (c) colony microstructure
Grahic Jump Location
Comparison of experimental and predicted average crack shape evolution: (a) equiaxed microstructure; (b) elongated microstructure, (c) colony microstructure

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In