0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Pressure Sensitive Nonassociative Plasticity Model for DRA Composites

[+] Author and Article Information
Xin Lei

Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, 212 EES Building, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802; Modine Manufacturing Company, Rancine, WI 53403-2552

Cliff J. Lissenden1

Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802lissenden@psu.edu

1

Corresponding author.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 129(2), 255-264 (Sep 13, 2006) (10 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2400273 History: Received December 02, 2005; Revised September 13, 2006

Discontinuously reinforced aluminum (DRA) is currently used where design considerations include specific stiffness, tailorable coefficient of thermal expansion, or wear resistance. Plastic deformation plays a role in failures due to low cycle fatigue or simple ductile overload. DRA is known to exhibit pressure dependent yielding. Plastic deformation in metals is widely regarded to be incompressible, or very nearly so. A continuum plasticity model is developed that includes a Drucker–Prager pressure dependent yield function, plastic incompressibility via a nonassociative Prandtl–Reuss flow rule, and a generalized Armstrong–Frederick kinematic hardening law. The model is implemented using a return mapping algorithm with backward Euler integration for stability and the Newton method to determine the plastic multiplier. Material parameters are characterized from uniaxial tension and uniaxial compression experimental results. Model predictions are compared to experimental results for a nonproportional compression–shear load path. The tangent stiffness tensor is nonsymmetric because the flow rule is not associated with the yield function, which means that the commonly used algorithms that require symmetric matrices cannot be used with this material model. Model correlations with tension and compression loadings are excellent. Model predictions of shear and nonproportional compression–shear loadings are reasonably good. The nonassociative flow rule could not be validated by comparison of the plastic strain rate direction with the yield function and the flow potential due to scatter in the experimental results. The model is capable of predicting the material response obtained in the experiments, but additional validation is necessary for the condition of high hydrostatic pressure.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Cross section of extruded 6092/SiC/17.5-T6 bar

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Initial yield locus for 6092/SiC/17.5p-T6 based on 40×10−6m∕m offset definition (15)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Flow chart for stress updating algorithm

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Fit of material hardening parameters to experimental data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Model correlation with characterization data

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Model prediction compared to torsion test results

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Model input for three nonproportional compression–shear load cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Predicted and experimentally determined directions of the plastic strain rate vector with respect to the yield locus, f=0, and g=constant (k=211MPa, a=0.67).

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Comparison of model prediction (line) with experimental results (solid circles): (a) axial response; and (b) shear response

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Predicted yield loci (Eq. 5) for k=220MPa and a=0, 0.078, and 0.156

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Deviation of the direction of the plastic strain rate vector with respect to the outward normal of the yield function, f=0: (a) k=220MPa, a=0.078 used to characterize the model; and (b) k=211MPa, a=0.67 that fit the 40×10−6m∕m offset initial yield locus.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In