Research Papers

The Wavelike Plastic Deformation of Single Crystal Copper

[+] Author and Article Information
Russell J. McDonald, Peter Kurath

Department of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1206 West Green Street, Urbana, IL 61801

Christos Efstathiou

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, 188 Rhodes Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 131(3), 031013 (Jun 04, 2009) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3120410 History: Received January 28, 2009; Revised March 18, 2009; Published June 04, 2009

The purpose of this work is to explore nonuniform plastic flow at small length- and time-scales. Pure single crystal copper tensile specimens were pulled along the [6¯56] crystal axis at three nominal strain-rates: 0.01%/s, 0.04%/s, and 0.10%/s. Simultaneously, the surface deformation was monitored with in situ digital image correlation over a length-scale of 100μm and a time-scale of 0.07–0.2 s. Sequential digital image correlation strain-rate fields show compelling evidence of a wavelike plastic deformation that is proportional to the nominal strain-rate and decelerates with increasing strain hardening. While a mechanism responsible for the waves is not identified, a methodology correlating observations of multiple researchers is forwarded.

Copyright © 2009 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Specimen geometry

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

fcc slip planes and directions represented relative to laboratory coordinates

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Micrograph showing surface slip lines and DIC ex situ axial strain fields illustrating the effect of magnification. Note that the scale bar is common for all magnifications.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Nominal stress versus strain for the three nominal strain-rates. Note that the 0.04%/s test had higher preloading than the 0.10%/s or 0.01%/s.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Cumulative probability distribution of axial strain line scan at various optical magnifications

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Stress-strain deformation and the DIC axial strain-rate field summary at 0.01%/s nominal strain-rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Stress-strain deformation and the DIC axial strain-rate field summary at 0.10%/s nominal strain-rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Normalized strain-rate wave velocity versus hardening

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Nominal hardening behavior

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Typical strain-rate fields represented in the laboratory-frame (xx, yy, xy) and the rotated-frame (bb, nn, nb)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Average strain components versus time for the 0.10%/s experiment resolved in the laboratory-frame (xx, yy, xy) and the rotated-frame (bb, nn, nb)




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In