Research Papers

Hole-Drilling Strain-Gauge Method: Residual Stress Measurement With Plasticity Effects

[+] Author and Article Information
D. Vangi

Department of Mechanics and Industrial Technology, Engineering Faculty, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italydario.vangi@unifi.it

S. Tellini

Department of Mechanics and Industrial Technology, Engineering Faculty, University of Florence, Via Santa Marta 3, 50139 Firenze, Italy

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 132(1), 011003 (Nov 02, 2009) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.3184030 History: Received July 25, 2008; Revised May 12, 2009; Published November 02, 2009; Online November 02, 2009

When measuring residual stresses using the hole-drilling strain-gauge method, plasticity effects arise if the residual stress level exceeds about 60% of the material yield strength. In this case the classical methods, which are based on the linear elastic material behavior, do not work properly and residual stresses are overestimated. This paper presents a numerical study of the influence of plasticity on residual stress measurement by using the hole-drilling strain-gauge method in those cases in which stress does not vary with depth. The study investigates the effects of the most important loading, measuring, geometry, and material variables. An iterative method, which can be applied to obviate these errors, is then presented. The method was implemented in ANSYS using the APDL macrolanguage (ANSYS Parametric Design Language Guide, Documentation for ansys 11.0) to automatically execute the procedure steps. A finite element model of the hole, which allows for plasticity, is requested. Employing the readings of a standard three elements strain-gauge rosette, the method makes it possible to extend the measurement limit in comparison to that of the ASTM E837 standard (ASTM E837-08, “Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gauge Method”).

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Through hole error with variation in the angular orientation of the strain-gauge rosette (Ω=0.414, σeq/σys=0.90, r=0.01, centered through hole); γ3 angle measured counter-clockwise from the direction of the maximum principal stress σx to strain gauge 3.

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Schematic diagram showing the geometry of a type A standard ASTM strain-gauge rosette (θ=90, 225, and 0 deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Difference between 1 (linear case), 2, and 5 Fourier coefficient curves and the strain-gauges numerically calculated in the case of Ω=0.414, σeq/σys=0.90 through hole, and r=0.05

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Iterative method to calculate residual stress utilizing the 3D numerical model: flowchart

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

HBM (www.hbm.com) rosette with four strain-gauges

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Experimental test strains and strain curves measured around the hole at each iteration: (a) first and second iteration and (b) third and last iteration

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Mesh utilized for the 3D model

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Schematic representation of the numerical drilling sequence: (a) one, (b) three, (c) five, and (d) ten drilling steps




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In