Research Papers

Processing Defects and Resulting Mechanical Properties After Metal Injection Molding

[+] Author and Article Information
J. C. Gelin1

Department of Applied Mechanics, FEMTO-ST Institute, ENSMM Besançon, 26 Rue de l’Epitaphe, 25030 Besançon, Francejean-claude.gelin@ens2m.fr

Th. Barriere, J. Song

Department of Applied Mechanics, FEMTO-ST Institute, ENSMM Besançon, 26 Rue de l’Epitaphe, 25030 Besançon, France


Corresponding author

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 132(1), 011017 (Dec 09, 2009) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2931155 History: Received August 23, 2007; Revised February 08, 2008; Published December 09, 2009; Online December 09, 2009

The paper is concerned with occurrence of processing defects and resulting mechanical properties associated with material processing by metal injection molding (MIM). MIM process is a multistep one that consists first in the injection of metallic powders mixed with a thermoplastic binder, followed by a debinding stage that permits to evacuate the polymeric binder, and then followed by a sintering stage by solid state diffusion that normally leads to a nearly dense component. The main defects arising during MIM processing are associated with powder segregation during injection molding, and uncompleted or heterogeneous mechanical properties resulting from solid state diffusion. The paper first describes a biphasic fluid flow approach that can accurately predict powder volume fraction after injection molding and consequently the associated segregation defects. This analysis is followed and continued by a proper sintering model based on an elastic-viscous analogy that predicts the resulting local densities after sintering and also associated defects. So, from the two subsequent models, it becomes possible to get the final powder densities after processing and to localize the possible resulting defects. This analysis is completed by an analysis using a porous material model to get the final resultant mechanical properties after processing.

Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

SEM photograph of the MIM feedstock composed of gas-atomized 316L stainless steel powders and wax-based thermoplastic binders

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Jetting phenomena arising in mold cavity during the filling stage with 316L stainless steel based feedstock: (a) original feedstock and (b) recycled feedstock

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Inhomogeneous green density in the molded components due to segregation defects occurring during injection step of MIM for 316L stainless steel: (a) injection molded components, (b) density contours of tensile test specimen, and (c) density contours of the wheel component through segmented parts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Cracks and distortion defects occurring during the debinding of 316L stainless steel MIM hip implants: (a) injection molded and debinded components, (b) cracks occurring during debinding, and (c) distortion occurring during debinding

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Viscosity curves obtained on the 316L stainless steel based feedstock and the associated viscous behaviors for each phase obtained from modeling

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

The filling states and powder volume fraction variations during the injection molding at different filling stages, obtained from biphasic injection simulations for 316L stainless steel feedstock

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

Uneven shrinkage of the 316L stainless steel wheel occurring after sintering in three orthogonal directions issued from numerical simulation by considering green inhomogeneity, friction, and gravity effects

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Final relative density of the sintered wheel in 316L stainless steel resulting from numerical simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

The dimensional variations of the wheel components in 316L stainless steel: (a) after injection molding and (b) after sintering

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Numerical prediction and the experimental data for yield strength and ultimate tensile strength of the 316L stainless steel sintered parts

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Comparison of the geometries of the 316L stainless steel tensile test specimens after injection molding and sintering indicating the uneven shrinkage in various directions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Distortion of the bending test specimen (316L stainless steel) occurring in sintering due to the defects associated with the injection molding step

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

The uniaxial viscosity and shrinkage obtained by the proposed model with the identified parameters for the 316L stainless steel: (a) uniaxial viscosity and (b) shrinkage

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Comparison of the geometries of the wheel part before and after sintering obtained by the numerical simulation



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In