Research Papers

Ultrasound Assisted Hybrid Carbon Epoxy Composites Containing Carbon Nanotubes

[+] Author and Article Information
Mrinal C. Saha

e-mail: msaha@ou.edu
School of Aerospace and
Mechanical Engineering,
University of Oklahoma,
Norman, OK 73019

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF Engineering Materials and Technology. Manuscript received June 18, 2012; final manuscript received November 8, 2012; published online January 23, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Hanchen Huang.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 135(1), 011009 (Jan 23, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: MATS-12-1148; doi: 10.1115/1.4023043 History: Received June 18, 2012; Revised November 08, 2012

A simple approach has been reported toward the development of hybrid nano/microfiber composite structures with improved mechanical properties. Ultrasound assisted atomization process has been utilized for depositing carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on the surface of carbon fiber (CF) cloth using dilute solutions of CNTs in N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF). Dilute solutions with three different CNT concentrations such as 1 × 10−4 g/ml, 5 × 10−4 g/ml, and 10 × 10−4 g/ml were fed into an ultrasonic atomizer probe using a positive displacement syringe pump and sprayed directly on CF cloth rested on a hot plate inside a deposition chamber. Several layers of hybrid CF cloths containing CNTs were used to fabricate composite laminates using a vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM). Although the dispersion of CNTs in DMF was found very well for all three concentrations, the distribution of CNTs on CFs was only found homogeneous for 1 × 10−4 g/ml solution. It was found that the hybrid composite containing 0.3 wt. % CNTs loading fabricated using 1 × 10−4 g/ml solution showed about 25% improvement in flexural strength, although moderate improvement in flexure modulus was achieved for all three concentrations. The improved strength is believed to be due to homogeneous distribution of CNTs, which resulted in increased surface roughness and mechanical interlocking between fibers and matrix.

© 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Iijima, S., 1991, “Helical Microtubules of Graphitic Carbon,” Nature, 354, pp. 56–58. [CrossRef]
Salvetat, J. P., Briggs, G. A. D., Bonard, J. M., and Bacsa, P. R., 1999, “Elastic and Shear Moduli of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Ropes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 82(5), pp. 944–947. [CrossRef]
Yakobson, B. I., Brabec, C. J., and Bernholc, J., 1996, “Nanomechanics of Carbon Tubes: Instabilities Beyond Linear Response,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 76(14), pp. 2511–2514. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Garcia, E. J., Wardle, B. L., Hart, A. J., and Yamamoto, N., 2008, “Fabrication and Multifunctional Properties of a Hybrid Laminate With Aligned Carbon Nanotubes Grown In Situ,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 68(9), pp. 2034–2041. [CrossRef]
Mathur, R. B., Chaterjee, S., and Singh, B. P., 2008, “Growth of Carbon Nanotubes on Carbon Fiber Substrates to Produce Hybrid/Phenolic Composites With Improved Mechanical Properties,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 68(7–8), pp. 1608–1615. [CrossRef]
Sadeghian, R., Gangireddy, S., Miaie, B., and Hsiao, K.-T., 2006, “Manufacturing Carbon Nanofibers Toughened Plyester/Glass Fiber Composites Using Assisted Resin Transfer Molding for Enhancing the Mode-I Delamination Resistance,” Composites, Part A, 37(10), pp. 1787–1795. [CrossRef]
Lourie, O., Cox, D. E., and Wagner, H. D., 1998, “Buckling and Collapse of Embedded Carbon Nanotubes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., 81(8), pp. 1638–1641. [CrossRef]
Thess, A., Lee, R., Nikolaev, P., Dai, H., Petit, P., Robert, J., Xu, C., Lee, Y. H., Kim, S. G., Rinzler, A. G., Colbert, D. T., Scuseria, G. E., Tomanek, D., Fischer, J. E., and Smalley, R. E., 1996, “Crystalline Ropes of Metallic Carbon Nanotubes,” Science, 273(5274), pp. 483–487. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Esawi, M. K., and Farag, M. M., 2010, “Polymer Nanotube Composites: Promises and Current Challenges,” Polymer Nanotube Composites, Mittal, V., ed., Wiley, New Jersey.
Ma, P. C., Wang, S. Q., Kim, J. K., and Tang, B. Z., 2009, “In-Situ Amino Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes Using Ball Milling,” J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 9(2), pp. 749–753. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Xu, X., Thwe, M. M., Shearwood, C., and Liao, K., 2002, “Mechanical Properties and Interfacial Characteristics of Carbon-Nanotubes-Reinforced Epoxy Thin Films,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 81(15), pp. 2833–2835. [CrossRef]
Lau, K. T., Shi, S. Q., and Cheng, M. H., 2003, “Micro-Mechanical Properties and Morphological Observation on Fracture Surfaces of Carbon Nanotube Composites Pre-Treated at Different Temperatures,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 63(8), pp. 1161–1164. [CrossRef]
Andrews, R., and Weisenberger, M. C., 2004, “Carbon Nanotube Polymer Composites,” Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 8(1), pp. 31–37. [CrossRef]
Garg, A., and Sinnott, S. B., 1998, “Effect of Chemical Functionalization on the Mechanical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes,” Chem. Phys. Lett., 295(4), pp. 273–278. [CrossRef]
Bekyarova, E., Thostenson, E. T., Yu, A., Kim, H., Gao, J., Tang, J., Hahn, H. T., Chou, T.-W., Itkis, M. E., and Haddon, R. C., 2007, “Multiscale Carbon Nanotube-Cabon Fiber Reinforcement for Advanced Epoxy Composites,” Langmuir, 23(7), pp. 3970–3974. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Berger, H. L., 1998, Ultrasonic Liquid Atomization: Theory and Application, Partridge Hill, New York.
Dobre, M., and Bolle, L., 2002, “Practical Design of Ultrasonic Spray Devices: Experimental Testing of Several Atomizer Geometries,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 26(2–4), pp. 205–211. [CrossRef]
Aligned MWNT (95+%, OD 10–20 nm), Nanostructured & Amorphous Materials, Inc., Houston, TX.
Thornel® T650/35 PAN-Based Carbon Fiber, Cytec Industries Inc., Woodland Park, NJ.
Technical Data Sheet: EPON™ Resin 862, EPIKURE Curing Agent W, Hexion Speciality Chemicals, Inc., Columbus, OH.


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic showing the fabrication of the hybrid composite

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of CNT coverage with respect to CF cloth and a sample calculation for CNT content in the composite (for sample type 3 in Table 1)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) Ultrasonic atomization setup for hybrid fabric and (b) VARTM setup for composite fabrication

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

SEM micrographs showing surface of CF (a) pristine and (b) after DMF sprayed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Effect of DMF exposure on flexure properties of carbon/epoxy composite

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

(a) UV–visible spectra of 1 × 10−4 g/ml CNT-DMF solution at different times after sonication and (b) photographs of solution with CNT concentration of 1 × 10−4 g/ml (left), 5 × 10−4 g/ml (middle), and 10 × 10−4 g/ml (right) just after sonication (top) and 48 h after the sonication (bottom)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Optical images of CNT-DMF solution spray droplets on glass substrate at two different spots with different concentrations (a) 2 ml of 1 × 10−4 g/ml, (b) 0.4 ml of 5 × 10−4 g/ml, and (c) 0.2 ml of 10 × 10−4 g/ml

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

SEM images (low magnification) showing distribution of CNTs on CFs for different CNT-concentrations (a) 1 × 10−4 g/ml, (b) 5 × 10−4 g/ml, and (c) 1 × 10−4 g/ml. For all three cases, the CNT content was 0.03% wt of CFs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

SEM images (high magnification) showing distribution of CNTs on CFs for different CNT concentrations (a) 1 × 10−4 g/ml, (b) 5 × 10−4 g/ml, and (c) 1 × 10−4 g/ml. For all three cases, the CNT content was 0.03% wt of CFs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Effect of CNT concentration on flexure properties of carbon/epoxy composite. Total amount of CNTs in the composite was about 0.03% wt of CFs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Schematic shows the distribution of CNTs on carbon fiber fabric during solvent evaporation penetration of the CNT inside the carbon fiber tow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

SEM images showing fracture surface of hybrid composite fabricated using (a) and (b) 1 × 10−4 g/ml and (c) and (d) 5 × 10−4 g/ml CNT-DMF solution with CNT loading of 0.03% wt of CFs. Arrows indicate CNTs.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

SEM micrographs of the fracture surface of hybrid composite fabricated using 10 × 10−4 g/ml CNT-DMF solution with CNT loading of 0.03% wt of CFs at (a) low magnification, and at (b) high magnification. Circles: voids; cross-circle: crack initiator void; arrows: CNTs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

SEM images showing distribution of CNTs on CFs at different CNT loadings (a) 0.03%, (b) 0.09%, and (c) 0.3% wt of CFs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Effect of CNT content on flexure properties of carbon/epoxy composite. All hybrid composites were fabricated using 1 × 10−4 g/ml CNT solution concentration.




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In