0
Research Papers

Forming Limits of a Sheet Metal After Continuous-Bending-Under-Tension Loading

[+] Author and Article Information
Ji He

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-Walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, PRC

Z. Cedric Xia

e-mail: zxia@ford.com

Danielle Zeng

Ford Motor Company,
Dearborn, MI 48121

Shuhui Li

Shanghai Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacture for Thin-walled Structures,
Shanghai Jiao Tong University,
Shanghai 200240, China;
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical System and Vibration,
Shanghai 200240, PRC

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received November 2, 2012; final manuscript received January 7, 2013; published online May 8, 2013. Assoc. Editor: Tetsuya Ohashi.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 135(3), 031009 (May 08, 2013) (8 pages) Paper No: MATS-12-1251; doi: 10.1115/1.4023676 History: Received November 02, 2012; Revised January 07, 2013

Forming limit diagrams (FLD) have been widely used as a powerful tool for predicting sheet metal forming failure in the industry. The common assumption for forming limits is that the deformation is limited to in-plane loading and through-thickness bending effects are negligible. In practical sheet metal applications, however, a sheet metal blank normally undergoes a combination of stretching, bending, and unbending, so the deformation is invariably three-dimensional. To understand the localized necking phenomenon under this condition, a new extended Marciniak–Kuczynski (M–K) model is proposed in this paper, which combines the FLD theoretical model with finite element analysis to predict the forming limits after a sheet metal undergoes under continuous-bending-under-tension (CBT) loading. In this hybrid approach, a finite element model is constructed to simulate the CBT process. The deformation variables after the sheet metal reaches steady state are then extracted from the simulation. They are carried over as the initial condition of the extended M–K analysis for forming limit predictions. The obtained results from proposed model are compared with experimental data from Yoshida et al. (2005, “Fracture Limits of Sheet Metals Under Stretch Bending,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 47(12), pp. 1885–1986) under plane strain deformation mode and the Hutchinson and Neale's (1978(a), “Sheet Necking—II: Time-Independent Behavior,” Mech. Sheet Metal Forming, pp. 127–150) M–K model under in-plane deformation assumption. Several cases are studied, and the results under the CBT loading condition show that the forming limits of post-die-entry material largely depends on the strain, stress, and hardening distributions through the thickness direction. Reduced forming limits are observed for small die radius case. Furthermore, the proposed M–K analysis provides a new understanding of the FLD after this complex bending-unbending-stretching loading condition, which also can be used to evaluate the real process design of sheet metal stamping, especially when the ratio of die entry radii to the metal thickness becomes small.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2013 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hill, R., 1952, “On Discontinuous Plastic States, With Special Reference to Localized Necking in Thin Sheets,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 1(1), pp. 19–30. [CrossRef]
Keeler, S. P., and Backofen, W. A., 1964, “Plastic Instability and Fracture in Sheets Stretched Over Rigid Punches,” ASM Trans. Quart., 65, p. 25.
Marciniak, Z., and Kuczynski, K., 1967, “Limit Strains in the Processes of Stretch-Forming Sheet Metal,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 9(9), pp. 609–612. [CrossRef]
Storen, S., and Rice, J., 1975, “Localized Necking in Thin Sheets,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 23(6), pp. 421–441. [CrossRef]
Hutchinson, J., and Neale, K., 1978a, “Sheet Necking—II: Time-Independent Behavior,” D. P. Koistinen, and N. M. Wang, eds., Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 127–150.
Hutchinson, J., and Neale, K., 1978b, “Sheet Necking—III: Strain-Rate Effects,” D. P. Koistinen, and N. M. Wang., eds., Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 269–285.
Hutchinson, J., Neale, K., and Needleman, A., 1978c, “Sheet Necking—I: Validity of Plane Stress Assumptions of the Long-Wavelength Approximation,” D. P. Koistinen, and N. M. Wang, eds., Mechanics of Sheet Metal Forming, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 111–126.
McClintock, F. A., Zhou, Q., and Wierzbick, T., 1993, “Necking in Plane Strain Under Bending With Constant Tension,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 41(8), pp. 1327–1343. [CrossRef]
Shi, M., and Gerdeen, J., 1991, “Effect of Strain Gradient and Curvature on Forming Limit Diagrams for Anisotropic Sheets,” J. Mater. Shaping Technol., 9(4), pp. 253–268. [CrossRef]
Assempour, A., Nejadkhaki, H. K., and Hashemi, R., 2010, “Forming Limit Diagrams With the Existence of Through-Thickness Normal Stress,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 48(3), pp. 504–508. [CrossRef]
Eyckens, P., Van Bael, A., and Van Houtte, P., 2011, “An Extended Marciniak-Kuczynski Model for Anisotropic Sheet Subjected to Monotonic Strain Paths With Through-Thickness Shear,” Int. J. Plast., 27(10), pp. 1577–1597. [CrossRef]
Triantafyllidis, N., 1980, “Bifurcation Phenomena in Pure Bending,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 28(3–4), pp. 221–245. [CrossRef]
Triantafyllidis, N., Needleman, A., and Tvergaard, V., 1982, “On the Development of Shear Bands in Pure Bending,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 18(2), pp. 121–138. [CrossRef]
Allwood, J. M., and Shouler, D. R., 2009, “Generalised Forming Limit Diagrams Showing Increased Forming Limits With Non-Planar Stress States,” Int. J. Plast., 25(7), pp. 1207–1230. [CrossRef]
Xia, Z. C., and Zeng, D., 2008, “Sheet Metal Forming Limit Under Stretch-Bending,” ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (ICMP2008), Evanston, IL, October 7–10, ASME Paper No. ICMP2008-72555, pp. 661–667. [CrossRef]
Tharrett, M., and Stoughton, T., 2003, “Stretch-Bend Forming Limits of 1008 AK Steel, 70/30 Brass, and 6010 Aluminum,” Tenth International Symposium on Plasticity and its Current Applications (PLASTICITY'03), Quebec, Canada, July 7–11, pp. 199–201.
Tharrett, M. R., and Stoughton, T. B., 2003, “Stretch-Bend Forming Limits of 1008 AK Steel,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1157. [CrossRef]
Kitting, D., Koplenig, M., Ofenheimer, A., Pauli, H., and Till, E., 2009, “Application of a ‘Concave-Side Rule’ Approach for Assessing Formability of Stretch-Bent Steel Sheets,” Int. J. Mater. Forming, 2, pp. 427–430. [CrossRef]
Kitting, D., Ofenheimer, A., Pauli, H., and Till, E., 2010, “A Phenomenological Concept to Predict Formability in Stretch-Bending Forming Operations,” Int. J. Mater. Forming, 3, pp. 1163–1166. [CrossRef]
He, J., Xia, Z. C., Li, S. H., and Zeng, D., 2013, “M–K Analysis of Forming Limit Diagram Under Stretch-Bending,” ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. (submitted).
Xia, Z. C., 2001, “Failure Analysis of Tubular Hydroforming,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 123(4), pp. 423–429. [CrossRef]
Yoshida, M., Yoshida, F., Konishi, H., and Fukumoto, K., 2005, “Fracture Limits of Sheet Metals Under Stretch Bending,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 47(12), pp. 1885–1896. [CrossRef]
Banabic, D., Barlat, F., Cazacu, O., and Kuwabara, T., 2010, “Advances in Anisotropy and Formability,” Int. J. Mater. Forming, 3, pp. 165–189. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Framework of the hybrid approach to evaluate the forming limits of CBT loading

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

The schematic setup for the CBT loading process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Schematic diagram of Gaussian material points through the thickness direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

The strain distribution through thickness direction after the material undergoes the die radius with R/t0 = 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The stress distribution through thickness direction after the material undergoes the die radius with R/t0 = 5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

The force evolution under three different R/t0 values in the x axis direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

The validation of the extended M–K analysis model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

FLD0 values under the n-value = 0.22 and three different imperfection conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The schematic of stretch bending test

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

FLD0 values under the n-value = 0.22 of proposed model compared with the Yoshida's regression equation with the same n-value

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

FLD0 values under the n-value = 0.22 of proposed model compared with the experimental results from Yoshida's paper

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Forming limit diagram on the right-hand side under the CBT loading condition with imperfection equal to 0.01

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Forming limit diagram on the right-hand side under the CBT loading condition with imperfection equal to 0.001

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Illustration of the hardening distribution along the thickness direction after the CBT loading condition for R/t0 equal to 50, 10, and 5

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In