0
Research Papers

Characterization of Hydrogen-Induced Contact Fracture in High-Strength Steel

[+] Author and Article Information
Akio Yonezu

Department of Precision Mechanics,
Chuo University,
1-13-27 Kasuga,
Bunkyo, Tokyo 112-8551,Japan
e-mail: yonezu@mech.chuo-u.ac.jp

Michihiro Niwa

Department of Precision Mechanics,
Chuo University,
1-13-27 Kasuga,
Bunkyo, Tokyo 112-8551,Japan

Xi Chen

Department of Earth
and Environmental Engineering,
Columbia University,
500 W 120th Street,
New York, NY 10027
International Center for Applied Mechanics,
SV Laboratory,
School of Aerospace,
Xi'an Jiaotong University,
Xi'an 710049, China
e-mail: xichen@columbia.edu

This study also confirmed the size of plastic zone at the maximum indentation force. The depth is about 200 μm which is much smaller than the specimen thickness (1 mm), suggesting that the boundary of bottom surface does not affect the stress field surrounding the impression for crack nucleation. Therefore, boundary effect can be ignored.

As preliminary computation, this study investigated how CZM parameter (maximum stress and crack growth resistance) affect the radial crack length. The maximum stress was varied in 0.6, 0.75, and 0.9 GPa (which covers the critical stress in Fig. 8), while the crack growth resistance (stress intensity factor) was changed in 3.5, 4.0 and 7.0 MPa m1/2. The result suggested that the crack length was strongly depending on the input value of crack growth resistance, while it showed less dependence of the critical stress of crack nucleation. Therefore, the maximum stress for CZM set to be constant with 0.65 GPa in this study.

The trend of Figs. 8 and 11 show different. As described in Sec. 4.2, although the critical stress for crack nucleation significantly decreases (compared with tensile strength of 2.45 GPa) due to hydrogen embrittlement, such a decreasing rate becomes minor when the hydrogen content is large. This trend is observed in Fig. 8. On the contrary, Kth is usually sensitive to hydrogen content, even if large hydrogen content (up to 49 ppm) [8].

1Corresponding authors.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received January 21, 2014; final manuscript received December 16, 2014; published online January 30, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Toshio Nakamura.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 137(2), 021007 (Apr 01, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: MATS-14-1017; doi: 10.1115/1.4029530 History: Received January 21, 2014; Revised December 16, 2014; Online January 30, 2015

This study investigated the hydrogen embrittlement (HE) cracking behavior produced by local contact loading of high-strength steel. When a spherical impression was applied to a hydrogen-absorbed high-strength steel, HE induces contact fracture, where radial cracks are initiated and propagated from the indentation impression. The length of the radial crack was found to be dependent on the hydrogen content in the steel as well as the applied contact force. A combined experimental/computational investigation was conducted in order to clarify the mechanism of hydrogen-induced contact fracture. In the computation, crack propagation was simulated using a cohesive zone model (CZM) in finite element method (FEM), in order to elucidate stress criterion of the present HE crack. It was found that the normal tensile stress was developed around impression, and it initiated and propagated the HE crack. It was also revealed that the hydrogen content enhanced contact fracture damage, especially the resistance of crack propagation (i.e., threshold stress intensity factor, Kth). The findings may be useful for countermeasure of contact fracture coupled with hydrogen in high-strength steel. Such phenomenon is potentially experienced in various contact components in hydrogen environment.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Louthan, M. R., 1983, “Strain Localization and Hydrogen Embrittlement,” Scr. Metall., 17(4), pp. 451–454. [CrossRef]
Steigerwald, E. A., Schaller, F. W., and Troiano, A. R., 1960, “The Role of Stress in Hydrogen Induced Delayed Failure,” Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 218, pp. 832–841.
Oriani, R. A., and Josephic, P. H., 1974, “Equilibrium Aspects of Hydrogen-Induced Cracking of Steels,” Acta Metall., 22(9), pp. 1065–1074. [CrossRef]
Gangloff, R. P., 2003, Hydrogen Assisted Cracking of High Strength Alloys Milne I, R. O.Ritchie, and B.Karihaloo, eds., Elsevier Science, New York.
Reddy, K. G., Arumugam, S., and Lakshman, T. S., 1992, “Hydrogen Embrittlement of Maraging Steel,” J. Mater. Sci., 27(19), pp. 5159–5162. [CrossRef]
Yonezu, A., Arino, M., Kondo, T., Hirakata, H., and Minoshima, K., 2010, “On Hydrogen-Induced Vickers Indentation Cracking in High-Strength Steel,” Mech. Res. Commun., 37(2), pp. 230–234. [CrossRef]
Szost, B. A., and Rivera-Diaz-del-Castillo, P. E. J., 2013, “Unveiling the Nature of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Bearing Steels Employing a New Technique,” Scr. Mater., 68(7), pp. 467–470. [CrossRef]
Yonezu, A., Hara, T., Kondo, T., Hirakata, H., and Minoshima, K., 2012, “Evaluation of Threshold Stress Intensity Factor of Hydrogen Embrittlement Cracking by Indentation Testing,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 531, pp. 147–154. [CrossRef]
Ciruna, J. A., and Szieleit, H. J., 1973, “The Effect of Hydrogen on the Rolling Contact Fatigue Life of AISI 52100 and 440C Steel Balls,” Wear, 24(1), pp. 107–118. [CrossRef]
Tanaka, H., Morofuji, T., Enami, K., Hashimoto, M., and Enami, J., 2013, “Effect of Environmental Gas on Surface Initiated Rolling Contact Fatigue,” Tribol. Online, 8(1), pp. 90–96. [CrossRef]
Kubota, M., Noyama, N., Sakae, C., and Kondo, Y., 2006, “Fretting Fatigue in Hydrogen Gas,” Tribol. Int., 39(10), pp. 1241–1247. [CrossRef]
Chen, X., 2005, “Foreign Object Damage on the Leading Edge of a Thin Blade,” Mech. Mater., 37(4), pp. 447–457. [CrossRef]
Lawn, B. R., 1993, Fracture of Brittle Solids, Cambridge University Press, New York.
Boyer, H. E., and Gall, T. L., 1985, Metals Handbook DeskEdition, W. H.Cubberly, and B. P.Bardes, eds., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH.
Gangloff, R. P., and Wei, R. P., 1974, “Gaseous Hydrogen Assisted Crack Growth in 18 Nickel Maraging Steels,” Scr. Metall., 8(6), pp. 661–668. [CrossRef]
Antlovich, S. D., Risbeck, T. R., Saxena, A., and Kawabe, Y., 1980, “The Effect of Microstructure on the Fracture Toughness of 300 and 350 Grade Maraging Steels,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 13(4), pp. 717–739. [CrossRef]
Tsay, L. W., Hu, Y. F., and Chen, C., 2005, “Embrittlement of T-200 Maraging Steel in a Hydrogen Sulfide Solution,” Corros. Sci., 47(4), pp. 965–976. [CrossRef]
Tsay, L. W., Lu, H. L., and Chen, C., 2008, “The Effect of Grain Size and Aging on Hydrogen Embrittlement of a Maraging Steel,” Corros. Sci., 50(9), pp. 2506–2511. [CrossRef]
Pao, P. S., and Wei, R. P., 1977, “Hydrogen Assisted Crack Growth in 18Ni (300) Maraging Steel,” Scr. Metall., 11(6), pp. 515–520. [CrossRef]
Cook, R. F., and Pharr, G. M., 1990, “Direct Observation and Analysis of Indentation Cracking in Glasses and Ceramics,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73(4), pp. 787–817. [CrossRef]
Evans, A. G., and Wilshaw, T. R., 1976, “Quasi-Static Solid-Particle Damage in Brittle Solids—I. Observations, Analysis, and Implications,” Acta Metall., 24(10), pp. 939–945. [CrossRef]
Chen, X., Ogasawara, N., Zhao, M., and Chiba, N., 2007, “On the Uniqueness of Measuring Elastoplastic Properties From Indentation: The Indistinguishable Mystical Materials,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 55(8), pp. 1618–1660. [CrossRef]
Hal, B. A. E., Peerlings, R. H. J., Geers, M. G. D., and Sluis, O., 2007, “Cohesive Zone Modeling for Structural Integrity Analysis of IC Interconnects,” Microelectron. Reliab., 47(8), pp. 1251–1261. [CrossRef]
Xia, Z., Curtin, W. A., and Sheldon, B. W., 2004, “A New Method to Evaluate the Fracture Toughness of Thin Films,” Acta Mater., 52(12), pp. 3507–3517. [CrossRef]
Olden, V., Thaulow, C., Johnsen, R., Østby, E., and Berstad, T., 2008, “Application of Hydrogen Influenced Cohesive Laws in the Prediction of Hydrogen Induced Stress Cracking in 25% Cr Duplex Stainless Steel,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 75(8), pp. 2333–2351. [CrossRef]
Tvergaard, V., and Hutchinson, J. W., 1992, “The Relation Between Crack-Growth Resistance and Fracture Process Parameters in Elastic Plastic Solids,” J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 40(6), pp. 1377–1397. [CrossRef]
Lee, J. H., Gao, Y. F., Johanns, K. E., and Pharr, G. M., 2012, “Cohesive Interface Simulations of Indentation Cracking as a Fracture Toughness Measurement Method for Brittle Materials,” Acta Mater., 60(15), pp. 5448–5467. [CrossRef]
Yamaguchi, Y., Nonaka, H., and Yamakawa, K., 1997, “Effect of Hydrogen Content on Threshold Stress Intensity Factor in Carbon Steel in Hydrogen-Assisted Cracking Environments,” Corros. NACE, 53(2), pp. 147–155. [CrossRef]
Sumitomo Metals, 1999, “High Strength High Toughness Stainless Steel HSL180,” Sumitomo Precision Products Co, Ltd., Amagasaki, Japan.

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Micrographs of the spherical impressions produced in hydrogen-charged specimens with different hydrogen content CH: (a) 11.8 ppm (charging time: 12 hr), (b) 24.8 ppm (24 hr), (c) 33.7 ppm (48 hr), and (d) 49.1 ppm (72 hr). They also include the magnified view of crack initiation site.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Distance from the impression center to radial crack initiation site with respected to hydrogen content CH (this figure also includes impression radius) (a). Panel (b) shows the distance from the impression center to end point of radial crack with respect to hydrogen content CH.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Two-dimensional FEM model for spherical indentation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Three-dimensional FEM model with cohesive zone element (CZM) for radial crack propagation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Contour map of circumferential stress σθθ at the indentation force of 150 N

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Surface distribution of σθθ as a function of radial distance r

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Changes in maximum σθθ as a function of radial distance. The indentation force is also shown in this figure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Critical stress for crack nucleation estimated by crack initiation site (in Fig. 2(a)) and maximum σθθ stress (in Fig. 7)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Contour map of crack nucleation area in the model of K = 4.5 MPa m1/2 (a) and 5.5 MPa m1/2 (b), in Fmax = 300 N case. Panel (c) shows the result of K = 4.5 MPa m1/2 in Fmax = 200 N case.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Changes in simulated crack length (distance to the crack end point) as function of input value of crack growth resistance (Kth) for the maximum force of 200 N and 300 N

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Estimated Kth with respect to hydrogen content CH

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Estimated Kth with the comparison of between spherical indentation and Vickers indentation. Previous study is Yonezu et al. [8].

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In