0
Research Papers

Strengthening and Improving Yield Asymmetry of Magnesium Alloys by Second Phase Particle Refinement Under the Guidance of Integrated Computational Materials Engineering

[+] Author and Article Information
Dongsheng Li

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,
CSMD,
Richland, WA 99352
Materials and Processes Engineering,
Pratt & Whitney,
East Hartford, CT 06118
e-mail: dongshengli@gmail.com

Curt Lavender

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,
CSMD,
Richland, WA 99352

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received March 12, 2014; final manuscript received March 24, 2015; published online May 8, 2015. Assoc. Editor: Said Ahzi.The United States Government retains, and by accepting the article for publication, the publisher acknowledges that the United States Government retains, a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 137(3), 031008 (May 08, 2015) (7 pages) Paper No: MATS-14-1054; doi: 10.1115/1.4030356 History: Received March 12, 2014

Improving yield strength and asymmetry is critical to expand applications of magnesium alloys in industry for higher fuel efficiency and lower CO2 production. Grain refinement is an efficient method for strengthening low symmetry magnesium alloys, achievable by precipitate refinement. This study provides guidance on how precipitate engineering will improve mechanical properties through grain refinement. Precipitate refinement for improving yield strengths and asymmetry is simulated quantitatively by coupling a stochastic second phase grain refinement model and a modified polycrystalline crystal viscoplasticity φ-model. Using the stochastic second phase grain refinement model, grain size is quantitatively determined from the precipitate size and volume fraction. Yield strengths, yield asymmetry, and deformation behavior are calculated from the modified φ-model. If the precipitate shape and size remain constant, grain size decreases with increasing precipitate volume fraction. If the precipitate volume fraction is kept constant, grain size decreases with decreasing precipitate size during precipitate refinement. Yield strengths increase and asymmetry approves to one with decreasing grain size, contributed by increasing precipitate volume fraction or decreasing precipitate size.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Joost, W. J. , 2012, “Reducing Vehicle Weight and Improving U.S. Energy Efficiency Using Integrated Computational Materials Engineering,” JOM, 64(9), pp. 1032–1038.
Li, D. , Garmestani, H. , and Adams, B. , 2005, “A Texture Evolution Model in Cubic-Orthotropic Polycrystalline System,” Int. J. Plast., 21(8), pp. 1591–1617. [CrossRef]
Li, D. , Garmestani, H. , and Ahzi, S. , 2007, “Processing Path Optimization to Achieve Desired Texture in Polycrystalline Materials,” Acta Mater., 55(2), pp. 647–654. [CrossRef]
Kulekci, M. K. , 2008, “Magnesium and Its Alloys Applications in Automotive Industry,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 39(9–10), pp. 851–865. [CrossRef]
Rokhlin, L. L. , 2003, Magnesium Alloys Containing Rare Earth Metals: Structure and Properties, Taylor & Francis, New York.
Nie, J.-F. , 2012, “Precipitation and Hardening in Magnesium Alloys,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 43(11), pp. 3891–3939. [CrossRef]
Jiang, B. , Liu, W. , Chen, S. , Yang, Q. , and Pan, F. , 2011, “Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of As-Extruded AZ31 Mg Alloy at High Temperatures,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 530(1), pp. 51–56. [CrossRef]
Zhu, S. , Gibson, M. , Easton, M. , and Nie, J. , 2010, “The Relationship Between Microstructure and Creep Resistance in Die-Cast Magnesium–Rare Earth Alloys,” Scr. Mater., 63(7), pp. 698–703. [CrossRef]
Estrin, Y. , and Vinogradov, A. , 2013, “Extreme Grain Refinement by Severe Plastic Deformation: A Wealth of Challenging Science,” Acta Mater., 61(3), pp. 782–817. [CrossRef]
Huang, Y. , and Langdon, T. G. , 2013, “Advances in Ultrafine-Grained Materials,” Mater. Today, 16(3), pp. 85–93. [CrossRef]
Commin, L. , Dumont, M. , Masse, J.-E. , and Barrallier, L. , 2009, “Friction Stir Welding of AZ31 Magnesium Alloy Rolled Sheets: Influence of Processing Parameters,” Acta Mater., 57(2), pp. 326–334. [CrossRef]
Li, D. , Sun, X. , and Khaleel, M. A. , 2012, “Materials Design of All-Cellulose Composite Using Microstructure Based Finite Element Analysis,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 134(1), p. 010911. [CrossRef]
Tschopp, M. , Wilks, G. , and Spowart, J. , 2008, “Multi-Scale Characterization of Orthotropic Microstructures,” Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng., 16(6), p. 065009. [CrossRef]
Xu, W. , Sun, X. , Li, D. , Ryu, S. , and Khaleel, M. A. , 2013, “Mechanism-Based Representative Volume Elements (RVEs) for Predicting Property Degradations in Multiphase Materials,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 68, pp. 152–159. [CrossRef]
Li, D. , Li, Y. , Hu, S. , Sun, X. , and Khaleel, M. , 2012, “Predicting Thermal Conductivity Evolution of Polycrystalline Materials Under Irradiation Using Multiscale Approach,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 43(3), pp. 1060–1069. [CrossRef]
Baniassadi, M. , Garmestani, H. , Li, D. , Ahzi, S. , Khaleel, M. , and Sun, X. , 2011, “Three-Phase Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Anode Microstructure Realization Using Two-Point Correlation Functions,” Acta Mater., 59(1), pp. 30–43. [CrossRef]
Yin, D. L. , Wang, J. T. , Liu, J. Q. , and Zhao, X. , 2009, “On Tension–Compression Yield Asymmetry in an Extruded Mg–3Al–1Zn Alloy,” J. Alloys Compd., 478(1), pp. 789–795. [CrossRef]
Park, S. , You, B. , and Yoon, D. , 2009, “Effect of the Extrusion Conditions on the Texture and Mechanical Properties of Indirect-Extruded Mg–3Al–1Zn Alloy,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 209(18), pp. 5940–5943. [CrossRef]
Jain, A. , Duygulu, O. , Brown, D. , Tomé, C. , and Agnew, S. , 2008, “Grain Size Effects on the Tensile Properties and Deformation Mechanisms of a Magnesium Alloy, AZ31B, Sheet,” Mater. Sci. Eng.: A, 486(1), pp. 545–555. [CrossRef]
Barnett, M. , Keshavarz, Z. , Beer, A. , and Atwell, D. , 2004, “Influence of Grain Size on the Compressive Deformation of Wrought Mg–3Al–1Zn,” Acta Mater., 52(17), pp. 5093–5103. [CrossRef]
Li, D. , Joshi, V. , Lavender, C. , Khaleel, M. , and Ahzi, S. , 2013, “Yield Asymmetry Design of Magnesium Alloys by Integrated Computational Materials Engineering,” Comput. Mater. Sci., 79, pp. 448–455. [CrossRef]
Li, D. , Ahzi, S. , M’Guil, S. , Wen, W. , Lavender, C. , and Khaleel, M. A. , 2014, “Modeling of Deformation Behavior and Texture Evolution in Magnesium Alloy Using the Intermediate ϕ-Model,” Int. J. Plast., 52(1), pp. 77–94. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of: (a) as -cast Mg-2.87Ce, showing fine grain structure [8] and (b) AZ31 after annealed at 600 °C, showing coarse grain structure [9]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

SEM images of AZ31: (a) before FSP and (b) after FSP [12], showing grain refinement due to SPD

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Synthetic micrographs of magnesium alloys with precipitates randomly distributed, featuring the same precipitate size and different volume fraction: (a) 1%, (b) 2%, and (c) 8%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Evolution of grain size with precipitate volume fraction from one series of micrographs with uniform precipitate size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Different synthetic micrographs constructed with the same statistical information of precipitates: volume fraction of 1%, long axis length of 9.8 μm, and short axis length of 3.3 μm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Analysis results from five different individual synthetic microstructures for each set of statistical descriptors of a precipitate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Evolution of regressed effective grain size with precipitate volume fraction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Evolution of variance for regressed effective grain size with precipitate volume fraction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Simulated microstructures for the magnesium alloy with the same volume fraction of 1% precipitate but different sizes: precipitate short axis length of: (a) 3.3 μm, (b) 2.3 μm, and (c) 1.5 μm

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Evolution of grain size with precipitate particle size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Evolution of grain size with precipitate volume fraction and size

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Evolution of yield strengths TYS, CYS, and CYS/TYS asymmetry with grain size in rolled AZ31 sheets simulated using a modified φ-model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Evolution of: (a) yield strengths and (b) yield asymmetry with precipitate size when the precipitate volume fractions remain constant

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Evolution of: (a) yield strengths and (b) yield asymmetry with precipitate volume fraction when the precipitate size is kept constant

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In