0
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology | Volume 138 | Issue 3 | research-article
Research Papers

A Novel Transparent Glass Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composite Interlayer for Blast-Resistant Windows

[+] Author and Article Information
Hua Zhu

Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering Department,
University of Missouri,
Columbia, MO 65211

S. K. Khanna

Mechanical and Aerospace
Engineering Department,
University of Missouri,
Columbia, MO 65211
e-mail: khannas@missouri.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received August 18, 2015; final manuscript received February 22, 2016; published online May 10, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Hareesh Tippur.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 138(3), 031007 (May 10, 2016) (11 pages) Paper No: MATS-15-1194; doi: 10.1115/1.4032882 History: Received August 18, 2015; Revised February 22, 2016
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

An optically transparent woven glass fiber-reinforced polyester composite has been fabricated. This composite has been used as an interlayer in the fabrication of a laminated glass-composite window panel for application in blast-resistant windows. The transparency of the glass fiber-reinforced composite was achieved by matching the refractive index of the polyester matrix with that of glass fibers. Various chemical additives have been investigated for their effectiveness in modifying the refractive index of the polyester matrix. The composite interlayer's mechanical properties under both quasi-static and dynamic loading conditions have been characterized in this study. The window panels were tested under various blast loading conditions. The panels perform well under U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) specified C, D, and E blast loading levels.
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

1
O'Brien, D. J. , and Parquette, B. , 2012, “ Polymer Toughness Transfer in a Transparent Interpenetrating Glass–Polymer Composite,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 73(1), pp. 57–63. [CrossRef]
2
Brennan, R. E. , and Green, W. H. , 2011, Nondestructive Characterization of Low Velocity Impact Damage in Transparent Laminate Systems, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
3
Iba, H. , Chang, T. , and Kagawa, Y. , 2002, “ Optically Transparent Continuous Glass Fibre-Reinforced Epoxy Matrix Composite: Fabrication, Optical and Mechanical Properties,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 62(15), pp. 2043–2052. [CrossRef]
4
Olson, J. R. , Day, D. E. , and Stoffer, J. O. , 1992, “ Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of an Optically Transparent Glass Fiber/Polymer Matrix Composite,” J. Compos. Mater., 26(8), pp. 1181–1192. [CrossRef]
5
Khanna, S. K. , Ellingsen, M. D. , and Winter, R. M. , 2004, “ Investigation of Fracture in Transparent Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites Using Photoelasticity,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 126(1), pp. 1–7. [CrossRef]
6
Moriwaki, T. , 1996, “ Mechanical Property Enhancement of Glass Fibre-Reinforced Polyamide Composite Made by Direct Injection Moulding Process,” Composites, Part A, 27(5), pp. 379–384. [CrossRef]
7
Iba, H. , Naganuma, T. , Matsumura, K. , and Kagawa, Y. , 1999, “ Fabrication of Transparent Continuous Oxynitride Glass Fiber-Reinforced Glass Matrix Composite,” J. Mater. Sci., 34(23), pp. 5701–5705. [CrossRef]
8
Iba, H. , and Kagawa, Y. , 1998, “ Light Transmittance of Continuous Fibre-Reinforced Composites: Analysis, Model Experiment and Parametric Study,” Philos. Mag. B, 78(1), pp. 37–52. [CrossRef]
9
Sarva, S. , Mulliken, A. D. , Boyce, M. C. , and Hsieh, A. J. , 2004, “ Mechanics of Transparent Polymeric Material Assemblies Under Projectile Impact: Simulations and Experiments,” 24th Army Science Conference, Orlando, FL, Nov. 29-Dec. 2.
10
Yahya, M. Y. , Cantwell, W. J. , Langdon, G. , and Nurick, G. , 2008, “ The Blast Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Laminates,” J. Compos. Mater., 42(21), pp. 2275–2297. [CrossRef]
11
Avci, A. , Arikan, H. , and Akdemir, A. , 2004, “ Fracture Behavior of Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite,” Cem. Concr. Res., 34(3), pp. 429–434. [CrossRef]
12
Nikpur, K. , Chen, Y. , and Kardos, J. , 1990, “ Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Short-Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 38(2), pp. 175–191. [CrossRef]
13
Mouritz, A. , 2001, “ Ballistic Impact and Explosive Blast Resistance of Stitched Composites,” Composites, Part B, 32(5), pp. 431–439. [CrossRef]
14
Pankow, M. , Salvi, A. , Waas, A. , Yen, C. , and Ghiorse, S. , 2011, “ Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Testing of 3D Woven Composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 71(9), pp. 1196–1208. [CrossRef]
15
Hokka, M. , Kuokkala, V. T. , and Ihme, S. , 2009, “ Dynamic Tensile Testing of Polyamide Sheets Using the HSB Technique,” SEM Annual Conference and Exposition on Experimental and Applied Mechanics, Albuquerque, NM, June 1-4.
16
Kim, W. , Argento, A. , Lee, E. , Flanigan, C. , Houston, D. , and Harris, A. , 2012, “ High Strain-Rate Behavior of Natural Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites,” J. Compos. Mater., 46(9), pp. 1051–1065. [CrossRef]
17
Jiang, F. , and Vecchio, K. S. , 2009, “ Hopkinson Bar Loaded Fracture Experimental Technique: A Critical Review of Dynamic Fracture Toughness Tests,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 62(6), pp. 1–39. [CrossRef]
18
Hosur, M. , Alexander, J. , Jeelani, S. , Vaidya, U. , and Mayer, A. , 2003, “ High Strain Compression Response of Affordable Woven Carbon/Epoxy Composites,” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., 22(3), pp. 271–296. [CrossRef]
19
Hosur, M. , Alexander, J. , Vaidya, U. , Jeelani, S. , and Mayer, A. , 2004, “ Studies on the Off-Axis High Strain Rate Compression Loading of Satin Weave Carbon/Epoxy Composites,” Compos. Struct., 63(1), pp. 75–85. [CrossRef]
20
Shokrieh, M. M. , and Omidi, M. J. , 2009, “ Compressive Response of Glass–Fiber Reinforced Polymeric Composites to Increasing Compressive Strain Rates,” Compos. Struct., 89(4), pp. 517–523. [CrossRef]
21
Cao, M. S. , Song, W. L. , Zhou, W. , Wang, D. W. , Rong, J. L. , and Yuan, J. , 2010, “ Dynamic Compressive Response and Failure Behavior of Fiber Polymer Composites Embedded With Tetra-Needle-Like ZnO Nanowhiskers,” Compos. Struct., 92(12), pp. 2984–2991. [CrossRef]
22
Shokrieh, M. M. , and Omidi, M. J. , 2009, “ Tension Behavior of Unidirectional Glass/Epoxy Composites Under Different Strain Rates,” Compos. Struct., 88(4), pp. 595–601. [CrossRef]
23
Schoßig, M. , Bierögel, C. , Grellmann, W. , and Mecklenburg, T. , 2008, “ Mechanical Behavior of Glass-Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Materials Under High Strain Rates,” Polym. Test., 27(7), pp. 893–900. [CrossRef]
24
Song, B. , Chen, W. , and Weerasooriya, T. , 2003, “ Quasi-Static and Dynamic Compressive Behaviors of a S-2 Glass/SC15 Composite,” J. Compos. Mater., 37(19), pp. 1723–1743. [CrossRef]
25
ASTM, 2007, “ Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM Standard No. D3039/D3039M-07.
26
ASTM, 2007, “ Standard Test Method for In-Plane Shear Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Tensile Test of a ±45° Laminate,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM Standard No. D3518/D3518M-94.
27
Cherepanov, G. , 1967, “ Crack Propagation in Continuous Media PMM,” J. Appl. Math. Mech., 31(3), pp. 503–512. [CrossRef]
28
Rice, J. R. , 1967, “ A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks,” ASME J. Appl. Mech., 35(2), pp. 379–386. [CrossRef]
29
Agarwal, B. , Kumar, P. , and Khanna, S. K. , 1986, “ Determination of the Fracture Toughness of Fabric Reinforced Composites by the J-Integral Approach,” Compos. Sci. Technol., 25(4), pp. 311–323. [CrossRef]
30
Landes, J. , and Begley, J. , 1972, “ The Effect of Specimen Geometry on JIC,” National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics and Fracture Toughness , Urbana-Champaign, IL, Aug. 31-Sept. 2, 1971, pp. 24–39.
31
Gama, B. A. , Lopatnikov, S. L. , and Gillespie, J. W. , 2004, “ Hopkinson Bar Experimental Technique: A Critical Review,” ASME Appl. Mech. Rev., 57(4), pp. 223–250. [CrossRef]
32
Phan, H. T. , 2012, High Strain Rate Behavior of Graphene Reinforced Polyurethane Composites, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
33
Woldesenbet, E. , and Vinson, J. R. , 1999, “ Specimen Geometry Effects on High-Strain-Rate Testing of Graphite/Epoxy Composites,” AIAA J., 37(9), pp. 1102–1106. [CrossRef]
34
ASTM, 2011, “ Standard Test Method for Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced Resins,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM Standard No. D2584-11.
35
Aditi, C. , 2012, On-Orbit Assessment of Satellite Structural Properties Via Robust Structural Health Monitoring, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
36
Van, D. H. H. C. , 1981, Light Scattering by Small Particles, Dover Publications, Mineola, NY.
37
Askadskii, A. A. , 1990, “ Influence of Crosslinking Density on the Properties of Polymer Networks,” Polym. Sci. USSR, 32(10), pp. 2061–2069. [CrossRef]
38
Murakami, K. , and Ando, S. , 2011, “ Effects of UV Crosslinking Under High Temperature on the Refractive Indices and Aggregation Structures of Benzophenone-Containing Polyimides,” J. Photopolym. Sci. Technol., 24(3), pp. 277–282. [CrossRef]
39
Jenkins, F. A. , and White, H. E. , 1957, Fundamentals of Optics, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
40
Zhu, H. , 2014, “ Fabrication and Characterization of Novel Transparent Laminated Glass-Composite Panels for Dynamic Load Mitigation,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
41
Khanna, S. K. , and Phan, H. T. , 2015, “ High Strain Rate Behavior of Graphene Reinforced Polyurethane Composites,” ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 137(2), pp. 1–10. [CrossRef]
42
Li, Y. , Lin, Z. , Jiang, A. , and Chen, G. , 2004, “ Experimental Study of Glass-Fiber Mat Thermoplastic Material Impact Properties and Lightweight Automobile Body Analysis,” Mater. Des., 25(7), pp. 579–585. [CrossRef]
43
Guo, Y. , and Li, Y. , 2007, “ Quasi-Static/Dynamic Response of SiO2–Epoxy Nanocomposites,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 458(1), pp. 330–335. [CrossRef]
44
Omar, M. F. , Akil, H. M. , Ahmad, Z. A. , Mazuki, A. A. M. , and Yokoyama, T. , 2010, “ Dynamic Properties of Pultruded Natural Fibre Reinforced Composites Using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Technique,” Mater. Des., 31(9), pp. 4209–4218. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of main components of an SHPB system

+Schematic of main components of an SHPB system
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Schematic of main components of an SHPB system
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Glass panel installation inside the BLS: (a) BLS and (b) glass panel inside BLS

+Glass panel installation inside the BLS: (a) BLS and (b) glass panel inside BLS
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Glass panel installation inside the BLS: (a) BLS and (b) glass panel inside BLS
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Phase of light after passing through a glass fiber

+Phase of light after passing through a glass fiber
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Phase of light after passing through a glass fiber
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Refractive index of polyester (cured product) with different DV concentrations (curing condition: curing temperature 20 °C, CE content 0.03 wt.%, and MEKP 1.2 wt.%)

+Refractive index of polyester (cured product) with different DV concentrations (curing condition: curing temperature 20 °C, CE content 0.03 wt.%, and MEKP 1.2 wt.%)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Refractive index of polyester (cured product) with different DV concentrations (curing condition: curing temperature 20 °C, CE content 0.03 wt.%, and MEKP 1.2 wt.%)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Refractive index of polyester (cured product) with different PT concentrations (curing condition: curing temperature 20 °C, CE content 0.03 wt.%, and MEKP 1.2 wt.%)

+Refractive index of polyester (cured product) with different PT concentrations (curing condition: curing temperature 20 °C, CE content 0.03 wt.%, and MEKP 1.2 wt.%)
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Refractive index of polyester (cured product) with different PT concentrations (curing condition: curing temperature 20 °C, CE content 0.03 wt.%, and MEKP 1.2 wt.%)
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Comparison between the experimentally measured light transmittance and theoretically predicted light transmittance

+Comparison between the experimentally measured light transmittance and theoretically predicted light transmittance
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Comparison between the experimentally measured light transmittance and theoretically predicted light transmittance
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Light transmittance spectrum of the laminated glass-composite panel

+Light transmittance spectrum of the laminated glass-composite panel
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Light transmittance spectrum of the laminated glass-composite panel
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

View of an outside scene, as seen through the window panel (left) and without the window panel (right), with camera placed 2 ft behind the panel

+View of an outside scene, as seen through the window panel (left) and without the window panel (right), with camera placed 2 ft behind the panel
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
View of an outside scene, as seen through the window panel (left) and without the window panel (right), with camera placed 2 ft behind the panel
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Stress–strain curves of the glass fiber-reinforced composite at different strain rates

+Stress–strain curves of the glass fiber-reinforced composite at different strain rates
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Stress–strain curves of the glass fiber-reinforced composite at different strain rates
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Surface micrographs of the glass fiber-reinforced composite at different strain rates: (a) 407 s−1, (b) 657 s−1, (c) 802 s−1, and (d) 960 s−1

+Surface micrographs of the glass fiber-reinforced composite at different strain rates: (a) 407 s−1, (b) 657 s−1, (c) 802 s−1, and (d) 960 s−1
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Surface micrographs of the glass fiber-reinforced composite at different strain rates: (a) 407 s−1, (b) 657 s−1, (c) 802 s−1, and (d) 960 s−1
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Level C test profiles: (a) pressure profile and (b) displacement profile

+Level C test profiles: (a) pressure profile and (b) displacement profile
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Level C test profiles: (a) pressure profile and (b) displacement profile
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Level D test profiles: (a) pressure profile and (b) displacement profile

+Level D test profiles: (a) pressure profile and (b) displacement profile
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Level D test profiles: (a) pressure profile and (b) displacement profile
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Laminated glass-composite panel of 7/16 in. thickness was cracked after the GSA level E blast test. Both the outer surfaces of the glass plies were smooth to touch and minor damage to the composite interlayer.

+Laminated glass-composite panel of 7/16 in. thickness was cracked after the GSA level E blast test. Both the outer surfaces of the glass plies were smooth to touch and minor damage to the composite interlayer.
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Laminated glass-composite panel of 7/16 in. thickness was cracked after the GSA level E blast test. Both the outer surfaces of the glass plies were smooth to touch and minor damage to the composite interlayer.
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Level E blast loading resulted in severe damage to the glass-composite window panel of 3/8 in. thickness

+Level E blast loading resulted in severe damage to the glass-composite window panel of 3/8 in. thickness
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Level E blast loading resulted in severe damage to the glass-composite window panel of 3/8 in. thickness
Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

A glass-composite panel of 5/8 in. thickness after level E blast loading

+A glass-composite panel of 5/8 in. thickness after level E blast loading
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
A glass-composite panel of 5/8 in. thickness after level E blast loading

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Synthesis and Characterization of Carboxymethyl Chitosan Based Hybrid Biopolymer Scaffold
International Conference on Mechanical and Electrical Technology, 3rd, (ICMET-China 2011), Volumes 1–3
Molecular Dynamics Study of Mechanical Properties of Carbon-Nanotube Reinforced LY556 Composites
International Conference on Computer and Electrical Engineering 4th (ICCEE 2011)
Damage Equivalence of Foam Core Sanswich Composites Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact and Quasi-Static Indentation Testing
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 4th (ICACTE 2011)
Design and Testing of Steel-Concrete Composite Vessel for Stationary High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage
International Hydrogen Conference (IHC 2016): Materials Performance in Hydrogen Environments
Conclusions
Bacteriophage T4 Tail Fibers as a Basis for Structured Assemblies> Chapter 5
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
This site uses cookies. By continuing to use our website, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. | Accept
Sign In