0
Research Papers

Estimation of Residual Stresses in Laminated Composites by Slitting Method Utilizing Eigen Strains

[+] Author and Article Information
M. M. Shokrieh

Composites Research Laboratory,
Center of Excellence in Experimental
Solid Mechanics and Dynamics,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Iran University of Science and Technology,
Narmak, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran
e-mail: Shokrieh@iust.ac.ir

M. A. Kamangar

Composites Research Laboratory,
Center of Excellence in Experimental
Solid Mechanics and Dynamics,
School of Mechanical Engineering,
Iran University of Science and Technology,
Narmak, Tehran 16846-13114, Iran

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received October 14, 2015; final manuscript received April 4, 2016; published online June 13, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Erdogan Madenci.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 138(4), 041003 (Jun 13, 2016) (8 pages) Paper No: MATS-15-1254; doi: 10.1115/1.4033374 History: Received October 14, 2015; Revised April 04, 2016

The manufacturing parameters such as curing process cause residual stresses in polymeric laminated composites. Therefore, an accurate method of measurement of residual stresses is essential for the design and analysis of composites structures. The slitting method is recently used for measurement of the residual stresses in laminated composites. However, this method has some drawbacks such as high sensitivity to noise of measurements and high scattering in the final results, which necessitate using of normalization techniques. Moreover, the form of polynomials, used in the conventional slitting method for calculation of the stiffness matrix, has a significant effect on final results. In this paper, it is shown that the major reason of the drawbacks of the slitting method in calculating the residual stresses is a direct use of the elastic released strains recorded by strain gages. In the present study, instead of direct calculation of residual stresses from the elastic released strains, eigen strain distribution as a constant and invariant field has been calculated from the recorded elastic strains. Then, by using the calculated eigen strain field in a finite-element model, the residual stress filed was obtained. Also, instead of using polynomials to calculate the compliance, a superposition method was used. The results show that the new method decreases the sensitivity of the final results to noise and scattering of the experimental data. It means that the normalization methods are not needed any more.

Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

A schematic figure of slitting method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Effect of number of terms in a polynomial on the condition number [9]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

The coordinate system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Finite-element model of a five-layer laminate model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

The groups of nodes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

A comparison of stresses calculated by the model and the FEM

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Effect of singularity of matrix M on results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

The customary emplacement of strain gages in slitting method

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

The front and back surfaces view of the model (left and right)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Comparison of the induced and calculated eigen strains

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Ratio of recorded elastic strain for different slot width

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

A view of 16-layer model

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

The deviation of estimated results from the exact results

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Laminated composite samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

The recorded strain during the slitting

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

A comparison between the results obtained by the MSS and conventional methods

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In