0
Research Papers

Application of the Continuous and Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Deformations to the Evaluation of the Initial Thickness of Bent Tubes

[+] Author and Article Information
Zdzisław Śloderbach

Department of Applications of
Chemistry and Mechanics,
Opole University of Technology,
Opole 45-758, Poland
e-mail: z.sloderbach@po.opole.pl

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received April 27, 2016; final manuscript received September 28, 2016; published online November 7, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Curt Bronkhorst.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 139(1), 011009 (Nov 07, 2016) (10 pages) Paper No: MATS-16-1126; doi: 10.1115/1.4034944 History: Received April 27, 2016; Revised September 28, 2016

The paper presents the derived equations for calculations of the initial wall thickness g0 of a tube bent to elbow. The expressions for calculating g0 are presented in a suitable measure of the “great active actual radius Rj” in the bending zone for an exact-generalized solution (continuous fields) and for three formal simplifications (discontinuous fields) of the first-, second-, and third-orders. The expressions to calculate the components of deformation for a generalized solution (continuous fields) are obtained on the basis of kinematically admissible fields of plastic deformations. In any case, a value of initial tube thickness depends on the radius and on the angle of bending αb on the external diameter of the tube, on the displacement of the neutral axis, and on the allowable (required) elbow thickness according to European, American, or other national technical standard or regulations. The initial thickness also depends on the coordinates of the point where the allowable thickness was determined and on the technological–material coefficient of the bending zone range k (defined during the tests). The obtained calculation results are presented in the form of graphs and in table.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Technical Committee CEN/TC 54, 2009, “ Unfired Pressure Vessels—Part 4: Fabrication, Tube Bents, or Earlier: Draft Standard EN UFPV (1996): Unfired Pressure Vessels—Part 4, Manufacture, CEN/TC54/267 JWGB N277, Rev. 5,” UNM, Paris, Standard No. EN 13445-4.
Franz, W. D. , 1961, Das Kalt-Biegen von Rohren, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Grunow, O. , 1985, Praktisches Rohrbiege, Springer–Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
Korzemski, J. W. , 1971, Bending of Thin-Walled Pipes (in Polish), WNT, Warsaw, Poland.
Śloderbach, Z. , 1999, “ A Model for Strain Geometry Evaluation in Pipe Bending Processes,” Eng. Trans., 47(1), pp. 3–20.
Śloderbach, Z. , and Strauchold, S. , 1999, “ Approximate Methods of Strain Calculations in the Tube Bending Process (in Polish),” Tech. Insp., 1, pp. 1–6.
Śloderbach, Z. , and Rechul, Z. , 2000, “ Effect of Strain Hardening and Normal Anisotropy on Allowable Values of Strain and Stress in Pipe-Bending Processes,” J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 4(38), pp. 843–859. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-article-BWM2-0011-0025
Śloderbach, Z. , 2002, Some Problems of Mechanics in Pipeline Bending Processes (in Polish), Publishing House of Wrocław University of Technology, Wrocław, Poland.
Śloderbach, Z. , 2014, “ Generalized Model of Strains During Bending of Metal Tubes in Bending Machines,” J. Theor. Appl. Mech., 52(4), pp. 1093–1106. [CrossRef]
Śloderbach, Z. , 2015, “ Derivation of Relations and Analysis of Tube Bending Processes Using Discontinuous Fields of Plastic Strains. Part I. Derivation of the Geometric-Analytic Relationships. Part II. Discussion and Analysis of the Obtained Results,” Int. J. Appl. Mech. Eng., 20(2), pp. 417–435. https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ijame.2015.20.issue-2/ijame-2015-0028/ijame-2015-0028.xml
Śloderbach, Z. , 2015, “ Determination of the Initial Thickness of Tubes Subjected to Bending. Part I. Derivation of the Basic Expressions and Relationships. Part II. Discussion and Analysis of Obtained Results,” Eng. Trans., 63(4), pp. 481–495, 497–507. http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-5a5b5d8a-a5bf-4b7c-8b76-af71eda027db
Śloderbach, Z. , and Pajak, J. , 2015, “ Determination of the Required Thicknesses of Pipe Elbows on the Basis of Expressions Resulting From EU-Directive,” Arch. Appl. Mech., 85(5), pp. 629–640. [CrossRef]
Tang, N. C. , 2000, “ Plastic-Deformation Analysis in Tube Bending Processes,” Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 77(12), pp. 751–759. [CrossRef]
Von Karman, T. , 1910, “ Festigkeitprobleme im Maschinenbau,” Encyklopedie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, B. G. Teubner , ed., p. 4.
Yang, H. , and Lin, Y. , 2004, “ Wrinkling Analysis for Forming Limit of Tube Bending Processes,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 152(3), pp. 363–369. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Z. , Hang, Z. , Yang, H. , Li, H. , Ren, N. , and Tian, Y. , 2011, “ Bending Behaviors of Large Diameter Thin-Walled CP-Ti Tube in Rotary Draw Bending,” Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int., 21(5), pp. 401–412. [CrossRef]
Jiang, Z. , Zhan, M. , Yang, H. , Xu, X. , and Li, G. , 2011, “ Deformation Behavior of Medium Strength TA18 High-Pressure Tubes During NC Bending With Different Bending Radii,” Chin. J. Aeronaut., 24(5), pp. 657–664. [CrossRef]
Seyna, F. , and Ginalski, J. , 1989, “ Evaluation of Residual Life in Steam Pipelines (in Polish),” Tech. Insp., 3, pp. 103–106.
Webster, G. A. , and Ainsworth, R. A. , 1994, High Temperature Component Life Assessment, Chapman & Hall, London.
Życzkowski, M. , and Szuwalski, K. , 1982, “ On the Termination of the Process of Finite Plastic Deformations,” J. Méc. Theor. Appl., 1, pp. 175–186.
Życzkowski, M. , and Tran, L. B. , 1997, “ Interaction Curves Corresponding to the De-Cohesive Carrying Capacity of a Cylindrical Shell Under Combined Loading,” Int. J. Plast., 13(6–7), pp. 551–570. [CrossRef]
Dzidowski, E. S. , and Strauchold, S. , 1998, “ Effect of Technological Factors in Pipe Bending on Damage Characteristics and Reliability of Power Pipelines (in Polish),” Scientific Papers of the Opole Technical University (Series Electricity), Vol. 46, Opole Technical University, Opole, Poland, pp. 119–125.
Farragher, T. P. , Scully, S. , and O'Dowd, N. P. , 2013, “ Development of Life Assessment Procedures for Power Plant Headers Operated Under Flexible Loading Scenarios,” Int. J. Fatigue, 49, pp. 50–61. [CrossRef]
Hähner, P. , Rinaldi, C. , Bicego, V. , Affeldt, E. , Brendel, T. , Andersson, H. , Beck, T. , Klingelhöffer, H. , Kühn, H. J. , Köster, A. , Loveday, M. , Marchionni, M. , and Rae, C. , 2008, “ Research and Development Into a European Code-of Practice for Strain-Controlled Thermo-Mechanical Test,” Int. J. Fatigue, 30(2), pp. 372–381. [CrossRef]
Wick, C. , Benedict, J. T. , and Veilleux, R. F. , 2001, Tool and Manufacturing Engineers Handbook, A Reference Book for Manufacturing Engineers, Managers and Technicians: Forming, 4th ed., Vol. II, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearbon, MI.
Calladaine, C. R. , 1969, Engineering Plasticity, Pergamon Press, Oxford, NY.
Hill, R. , 1985, Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
Kachanov, L. M. , 1971, Foundations of the Theory of Plasticity, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lubliner, J. , 1990, Theory of Plasticity, Macmillan, New York.
Olszak, W. , Perzyna, P. , and Sawczuk, A. , ed., 1981, Theory of Plasticity, PWN, Warsaw, Poland.
Sokołowski, W. W. , 1987, Theory of Plasticity, PWN, Warsaw, Poland.
Job Publishing Company, 2003, “ Pressure Installations. General Requirements. Bending Elbows. Strength Calculations (in Polish),” Company Legal, Warsaw, Poland, UDT Conditions (WUDT-UC-WO-O/02:10), Issue 1.
Job Publishing Company, 1991, “ General Requirements. Manufacturing. Bending Pipes of Pressure Elements (in Polish),” Job Publishing Company Legal, Warsaw, Poland, UDT Conditions (DT-UT-90/WO-W/06).
Haupt, P. , 2002, Continuum Mechanics and Theory of Materials, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Huttel, C. , and Matzenmiller, A. , 1999, “ Extension of Generalized Plasticity to Finite Deformations and Structures,” Int. J. Plast., 36(34), pp. 5255–5276.
Śloderbach, Z. , and Pajak, J. , 2010, “ Generalized Coupled Thermoplasticity Taking Into Account Large Strains: Part I. Conditions of Uniqueness of the Solution of Boundary-Value Problem and Bifurcation Criteria,” Math. Mech. Solids, 15(3), pp. 308–327. [CrossRef]
El-Sebaie, M. G. , and Mellor, P. B. , 1972, “ Plastic Instability Conditions in the Deep-Drawing of a Circular Blank of Sheet Metal,” Int. J. Mech. Sci., 14(9), pp. 535–540. [CrossRef]
Gabryszewski, Z. , and Gronostajski, J. , 1991, Fundamentals of Metal-Working Processes (in Polish), WNT, Warsaw, Poland.
Marciniak, Z. , 1971, Limit Deformations in Sheet Metal Forming (in Polish), WNT, Warsaw, Poland.
Moore, G. G. , and Wallace, J. F. , 1964, “ The Effect of Anisotropy on Instability in Sheet-Metal Forming,” J. Inst. Met., 93(2), pp. 33–38.
Ostrowska-Maciejewska, J. , Szeptyński, P. , and, Pęcherski, R. B. , 2013, “ Mathematical Foundations of Limit Criterion for Anisotropic Materials,” Arch. Metall. Mater., 58(4), pp. 1223–1235. https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/amm.2013.58.issue-4/amm-2013-0155/amm-2013-0155.xml

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Geometrical and dimensional quantities pertaining to tube-bending processes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic picture of the elbow cross section and its characteristic parameters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

(a) and (b) The schemes of connections of elbows with straight sections of pipelines: (a) for the case when centering isdone on the external pipe side (both dext are equal), (b) forthe case when centering is done based on the internal pipe side (both dint are equal). In both cases, it should be, that (g0 > g1min > gt). Remaining parameters as on Fig. 2.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Scheme of the connection of a elbow and a straight section of a pipe when their internal and external diameters are equal, then (g1min  < gt), where gt is the thickness of the tube, rtm is the radius of the template, and m is the straight section of the elbow

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scheme of a tube bending machine with a rotating template and a mandrel, (1) mandrel, (2) clamp bolt, (3) rotating template, (4) sliding slat, (5) planisher, (6) bed of sliding slat, (7) bending pipe, and (8) mandrels rod

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Variation of the initial thickness versus R for four calculation methods, for α=β=0 deg, kαb=180 deg and (g0=g0ext max,g0′=g0ext max′,g0″=g0ext max″,g0‴=g0ext max‴)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Exemplary calculations of the wall thickness distribution g1, depending on the neutral axis displacement y0, where (dzdext)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Variation of the maximum initial thickness (g0ext′=g0ext max′,g0int′=g0int max′) of the wall of a tube subjected to bending, calculated according to a simplification of the first order and in measures of logarithmic strains, versus the bending radius R, when the required minimum wall thickness of the bent elbow is g1 = 4.5 mm and (α=β=0 deg, kαb=180 deg)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Exemplary calculations of longitudinal deformations φ1, depending on the neutral axis displacement y0, where (dzdext)

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In