0
Research Papers

Numerical Evaluation of AASHTO Drag Force Coefficients of Water Flow Around Bridge Piers

[+] Author and Article Information
Amin Almasri

Associate Professor
Civil Engineering Department,
Jordan University of Science and Technology,
Irbid 22110, Jordan
e-mail: ahalmasri@just.edu.jo

Shadi Moqbel

Assistant Professor
Civil Engineering Department,
The University of Jordan,
Amman 11942, Jordan
e-mail: s.moqbel@ju.edu.jo

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received April 13, 2016; final manuscript received August 31, 2016; published online February 1, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Xi Chen.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 139(2), 021001 (Feb 01, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: MATS-16-1112; doi: 10.1115/1.4035253 History: Received April 13, 2016; Revised August 31, 2016

Drag force is usually exerted on bridge piers due to running river water. This force is calculated empirically based on drag coefficients stated in design codes and specifications. Different values of drag coefficients have been reported in literature. For example, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications uses a drag coefficient of 1.4 and 0.7 for square-ended and semicircular-nosed pier, respectively, while Coastal Construction Manual (FEMA P-55) recommends a value of two and 1.2 for square and round piles, respectively. In addition, many researchers have obtained other different values of drag coefficient under similar conditions (i.e., similar range of Reynolds number) reaching to 2.6 for square object. The present study investigates the drag coefficient of flow around square, semicircular-nosed, and 90 deg wedged-nosed and circular piers numerically using finite element method. Results showed that AASHTO values for drag force coefficient varied between very conservative to be under-reckoning. The study recommends that AASHTO drag coefficient values should be revised for different circumstances and under more severe conditions.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

AASHTO, 2013, “ AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,” 6th ed., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC.
FEMA, 2011, “ Coastal Construction Manual: Principles and Practices of Planning, Siting, Designing, Constructing, and Maintaining Residential Buildings in Coastal Areas,” 4th ed., Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, Standard No. FEMA P-55.
McConnell, K. , Allsop, W. , and Cruickshank, I. , 2004, Piers, Jetties and Related Structures Exposed to Waves: Guidelines for Hydraulic Loadings, Thomas Telford Publishing, London.
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, 1984, Shore Protection Manual, 4th ed., Department of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers Coastal Engineering Research Center, Vicksburg, MS.
Sumer, B. , and Fredsoe, J. , 2006, Hydrodynamics Around Cylindrical Structures (Advanced Series on Ocean Engineering, Vol. 26), Revised ed., World Scientific Publishing, Ithaca, NY.
Debus, K. , Berkoe, J. , Rosendall, B. , and Shakib, F. , 2003, “ Computational Fluid Dynamics Model for Tacoma Narrows Bridge Upgrade Project,” ASME Paper No. FEDSM2003-45514.
Wenxiu, L. , Bing, Z. , and Xulin, H. , 2011, “ Two-Dimensional Numerical Simulation of Drag Coefficients on Two Square Cylinders at High Reynolds Number,” International Conference on Opto-Electronics Engineering and Information Science, Xi'an, China, Dec. 23–25, Vol. 3, pp. 2283–2286.
Mallikarjuna, P. , Babu, C. , Murali, T. , and Kumar, M. , 2004, “ Bridge Piers—Drag Force Coefficients,” ISH J. Hydraul. Eng., 10(1), pp. 48–55. [CrossRef]
Sharma, A. , and Eswaran, V. , 2004, “ Heat and Fluid Flow Across a Square Cylinder in the Two-Dimensional Laminar Flow Regime,” Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 45(3), pp. 247–269. [CrossRef]
Lamura, A. , Gompper, G. , Ihle, T. , and Kroll, D. , 2001, “ Multi-Particle Collision Dynamics: Flow Around a Circular and a Square Cylinder,” Europhys. Lett., 56(3), pp. 319–325. [CrossRef]
Tsutsui, T. , 2008, “ Fluid Force Acting on a Cylindrical Pier Standing in a Scour,” BBAA VI International Colloquium on Bluff Bodies Aerodynamics and Applications, Milano, Italy, July 20–24, Paper No. VC06.
Sato, M. , and Kobayashi, T. , 2012, “ A Fundamental Study of the Flow Past a Circular Cylinder Using ABAQUS/CFD,” SIMULIA Community Conference, Providence, RI, May 15–17, pp. 1–15.
Wei-Bin, G. , and Bao-Chang, S. , 2003, “ Lattice-BGK Simulation of a Two-Dimensional Channel Flow Around a Square Cylinder,” Chin. Phys., 12(1), pp. 67–74. [CrossRef]
Yoon, D. , Yang, K. , and Choi, C. , 2010, “ Flow Past a Square Cylinder With an Angle of Incidence,” Phys. Fluids, 22(4), p. 043603. [CrossRef]
Sohankar, A. , Norberg, C. , and Davidson, L. , 1999, “ Simulation of Three-Dimensional Flow Around a Square Cylinder at Moderate Reynolds Numbers,” Phys. Fluids, 11(2), pp. 288–306.
Dutta, S. , Panigrahi, P. , and Muralidhar, K. , 2008, “ Experimental Investigation of Flow Past a Square Cylinder at an Angle of Incidence,” J. Eng. Mech., 134(9), pp. 788–803. [CrossRef]
He, G. , Li, N. , and Wang, J. , 2014, “ Drag Reduction of Square Cylinders With Cut-Corners at the Front Edges,” Exp. Fluids, 55(6), p. 1745 [CrossRef]
Lindsey, W. , 1937, “ Drag of Cylinders of Simple Shapes,” National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Langley Field, VA, Report No. 619.
Roshko, A. , 1955, “ The Wake and Drag of Bluff Bodies,” J. Aeronaut. Sci., 22(2), pp. 124–132. [CrossRef]
Hoerner, S. , 1965, Fluid Dynamics Drag, Hoerner Fluid Dynamics, Bakersfield, CA.
Yamagishi, Y. , Kimura, S. , Oki, M. , and Hatayama, C. , 2009, “ Effect of Corner Cutoffs on Flow Characteristics Around a Square Cylinder,” 10th International Conference on Fluid Control, Measurements, and Visualization (FLUCOME), Moscow, Russia, Aug. 17–21, pp. 1–10.
Kallaka, T. , and Wang, C. J. , 2011, “ Efficient Numerical Model for Studying Bridge Pier Collapse in Floods,” International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 5(12), pp. 1011–1016.
Hughes, W. F. , and Brighton, J. A. , 1999, Schaum's Outline of Fluid Dynamics, McGraw-Hill, New York, p. 102.
Wang, M. , Catalano, P. , and Iaccarino, G. , 2001, “ Prediction of High Reynolds Number Flow Over a Circular Cylinder Using LES With Wall Modeling,” Annual Research Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, pp. 45–50.
Hinsberg, N. , Lueckhof, J. M. , and Nuhn, J. , 2014, “ The Reynolds Number Effect From Subcritical to High Transcritical on Steady and Unsteady Loading on a Rough Circular Cylinder,” 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014, Porto, Portugal, June 30–July 2, pp. 3211–3218.
Jempson, M. A. , 2000, “ Flood and Debris Loads on Bridges,” Master's thesis, University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Mussa, A. , Asinari, P. , and Luo, L. , 2009, “ Lattice Boltzmann Simulations of 2D Laminar Flows Past Two Tandem Cylinders,” J. Comput. Phys., 228(4), pp. 983–999. [CrossRef]
Wardhana, K. , and Hadipriono, F. , 2003, “ Analysis of Recent Bridge Failures in the United States,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 17(3), pp. 144–150. [CrossRef]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Vertical and horizontal dimensions of the models (dimensions in meters): (a) square pier, (b) semicircular-nosed pier, and (c) wedged-nosed pier

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Convergence of drag coefficient value for different types of finite elements

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Pressure contours at (a) velocity of 0.001 m/s and (b) velocity of 1 m/s for square pier

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Longitudinal drag coefficient at different Reynolds numbers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Inclined flow direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Pressure contours at flow angle of (a) θ = 10 deg and (b) θ = 20 deg, for square pier at flow velocity of 1 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Drag coefficient versus time at different flow angles for a square pier at 1 m/s flow velocity: (a) V = 1 m/s, angle = 5 deg; (b) V = 1 m/s, angle = 10 deg; (c) V = 1 m/s, angle = 20 deg; (d) V = 1 m/s, angle = 30 deg; and (e) V = 1 m/s, angle = 45 deg

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Drag coefficient for a square pier for different flow orientation angles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Longitudinal drag coefficient for semicircular-nosed pier

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Longitudinal drag coefficient for wedged-nosed pier

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Drag coefficient versus Reynolds number for circular pier

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Velocity contour around square pier at flow velocity of 1 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Velocity contour around two tandem square piers at flow velocity of 1 m/s

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Drag coefficient of two tandem square piers at flow velocity of 1 m/s

Tables

Errata

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In