0
Research Papers

Evaluation of Elastoplasticity-Dependent Creep Property of Magnesium Alloy With Indentation Method: A Reverse Numerical Algorithm and Experimental Validation

[+] Author and Article Information
Shoichi Fujisawa

Department of Precision Mechanics,
Chuo University,
1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo,
Tokyo 112-8551, Japan

Akio Yonezu

Department of Precision Mechanics,
Chuo University,
1-13-27 Kasuga, Bunkyo,
Tokyo 112-8551, Japan
e-mail: yonezu@mech.chuo-u.ac.jp

Masafumi Noda

Magnesium Division,
Gonda Metal Industry Co., Ltd.,
1-1-16 Miyashimo, Chuo,
Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-0212, Japan

Baoxing Xu

Department of Mechanical and
Aerospace Engineering,
University of Virginia,
Charlottesville, VA 22904
e-mail: bx4c@virginia.edu

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 20, 2016; final manuscript received August 29, 2016; published online February 1, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Xi Chen.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 139(2), 021004 (Feb 01, 2017) (9 pages) Paper No: MATS-16-1147; doi: 10.1115/1.4035280 History: Received May 20, 2016; Revised August 29, 2016

Magnesium (Mg) alloys have been widely used in automotive and aerospace industries due to its merits of exceptional lightweight, super strong specific strength, and high corrosion-resistance, where intermetallic compounds with a small volume are very critical to achieve these excellent performance. This study proposes a reverse analysis that can be employed to extract elastoplasticity-dependent creep property of commercial die-cast Mg alloys and their intermetallic compounds from instrumented indentation with two sharp indenters. First, the creep deformation that obeys the Norton's law (ε˙  = Aσn) is studied, and the parameters of A and n are determined from two indentation experiments conducted with different sharp indenters. Then, a numerical algorithm and dimensional function developed is extended to extract the elastoplasticity of various metallic materials by focusing on the loading stage of indentation experiments. By considering the full loading history with both linear increase and holding stages of loads, we propose a framework of reverse analysis to determine both elastoplasticity and creep properties simultaneously. Parallel indentation experiments on pure magnesium and aluminum and Mg alloys are performed, and the results agree well with the numerical predictions.

Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Microstructure of α-Mg and β-Mg17Al12 in die-cast magnesium alloy (AZ91D)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Relationship between indentation creep depth and creep time and indentation curve

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Two-dimensional axisymmetric FEM model of indentation test with triangle indenter and input creep parameter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Relationship between indentation creep depth and creep time by changing the creep parameter, n

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Dimensionless function of pure Mg obtained by 115 deg triangle indenter

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relationship between h˙/E*nAhmax and n estimated by indentation creep test of Fig. 2

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Dimensionless function of pure Mg obtained by 115 deg triangle indenter. This compares with n−h˙/E*nAhmax curve estimated by indentation creep test for pure Mg.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Relationship between creep parameter A and n for 115 deg and 100 deg triangle indenters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Relationship between indentation creep depth and creep time for β-phase

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Relationship between indentation creep depth and creep time for α-phase

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Relationship between C/E* and σr/E* for 115 deg and 100 deg triangle indenters

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Comparison of σr/E* estimated by experiment and σr/E*—slope and intercept of n−h˙/E*nAhmax curve for 115 deg triangle indenter (A = 2.5 × 10−10)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Flowchart of estimation process

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Comparison of estimated σr/E* with input ones for 115 deg and 100 deg triangle indenter experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Comparison of estimated creep parameter with input ones

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In