0
Research Papers

Micro-Computed Tomography as a Tool to Investigate the Deformation Behavior of Particulate-Filled Composite Materials

[+] Author and Article Information
Kenan Cinar

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
Namik Kemal University,
Tekirdag 59860, Turkey;
Department of Mechanical and
Nuclear Engineering,
Virginia Commonwealth University,
Richmond, VA 23284
e-mail: kcinar@nku.edu.tr

Ibrahim Guven

Department of Mechanical and
Nuclear Engineering,
Virginia Commonwealth University,
Richmond, VA 23284
e-mail: iguven@vcu.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received March 13, 2017; final manuscript received July 31, 2017; published online September 13, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Hareesh Tippur.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 140(2), 021001 (Sep 13, 2017) (18 pages) Paper No: MATS-17-1073; doi: 10.1115/1.4037658 History: Received March 13, 2017; Revised July 31, 2017

Micro-computed tomography (CT) was used as a tool to investigate the deformation behavior of particulate-filled composite materials. Three different shapes of glass fillers (spherical, flake, and fiber) and filler mass fractions (5%, 10%, and 15%) were introduced to the epoxy resin. Rockwell hardness H scale indentation test was used to deform the composite material. The composite materials were scanned before and after the indentation test by using micro-CT. Displacement field for each filler type and mass fraction were measured through correlation of before and after scan data. The effects of filler type and mass fraction on the internal displacement field were investigated. It was also demonstrated that micro-CT can be used as a tool to create realistic representative volume elements (RVEs) for particulate-filled composite materials instead of randomly distributed particles within the matrix material.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

(a) Spherical fillers, (b) flake fillers, and (c) rod fillers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Filler mass fraction versus global threshold value

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Top row: 5% spherical, middle row: 5% flake, and bottom row: 5% fiber mass fraction. Columns: (a) grayscale image, (b) gray-level histograms with global threshold values identified, and (c) resulting binary images.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Hardness (left) and micro-CT (right) test samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Experimental and postprocessing steps for composite with 5% spherical glass filler. (a) Grayscale image (grays converted to red on-screen for better visibility), (b) binary image, (c) randomly selected subvolume from the binary image, and (d) voxel representation of spherical fillers in the subvolume.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Experimental and postprocessing steps for composite with 5% glass flake filler. (a) Grayscale image (grays converted to red on-screen for better visibility), (b) binary image, (c) randomly selected subvolume from the binary image, and (d) voxel representation of flake fillers in the subvolume.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Experimental and postprocessing steps for composite with 5% glass fiber filler. (a) Grayscale image (grays converted to red on-screen for better visibility), (b) binary image, (c) randomly selected subvolume from the binary image, and (d) voxel representation of fiber fillers in the subvolume.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Hardness values for neat epoxy and the particulate composites

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Undeformed (left column) and postindentation (right column) micro-CT images for samples with 5% spherical (top row), flake (middle row), and fiber (bottom row) fillers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Deformation patterns due to indentation along vertical planes passing through the centers of samples with 5% mass ratio for spherical (top), flake (middle), and fiber (bottom) fillers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

(a) Displacement field in z-direction (in voxel scale), normal strain fields (b) in z-direction (c) and in x-direction, and (d) shear strain field in yz-direction, plotted along a vertical plane passing through the center of indentation of samples with 5% mass ratio spherical fillers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

(a) Displacement field in z-direction (in voxel scale), normal strain fields (b) in z-direction (c) and in x-direction, and (d) shear strain field in yz-direction, plotted along a vertical plane passing through the center of indentation of samples with 5% mass ratio flake fillers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

(a) Displacement field in z-direction (in voxel scale), normal strain fields (b) in z-direction (c) and in x-direction, and (d) shear strain field in yz-direction, plotted along a vertical plane passing through the center of indentation of samples with 5% mass ratio fiber fillers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Displacement field in z-direction plotted along a vertical plane passing through the center of indentation of samples. (a) Set 1 samples and (b) set 2 samples.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Displacement in z-direction through the thickness of the samples for: (a) 5%, (b) 10%, and (c) 15% filler mass fraction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Displacements in z-direction along y-axis, at different depths, comparison of spherical, flake, and fiber fillers, for mass fractions: (a) 5%, (b) 10%, and (c) 15%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Displacements in z-direction along y-axis, at different depths, comparison of 5%, 10%, and 15% mass fractions, for: (a) spherical, (b) flake, and (c) fiber fillers

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Normal strain field in z-direction plotted along a vertical plane passing through the center of indentation of set 1 samples

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Shear strain field evaluated at a vertical plane passing through the center of indentation of samples. (a) Set 1 samples and (b) set 2 samples.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 20

Normal strain field in x-direction plotted along a vertical plane passing through the center of indentation of samples. (a) Set 1 samples and (b) set 2 samples.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 21

Strain field in z-direction plotted along xz- and yz-planes passing through the center of indentation for 15% mass filler ratio for set 2 samples

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In