0
Research Papers

Microstructure Modeling of Dynamically Recrystallized Grain Size of Sintered Al–4 wt % B4C Composite During Hot Upsetting

[+] Author and Article Information
R. Seetharam

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Institute of Technology,
Warangal 506004, Telangana, India
e-mail: c2ram88@nitw.ac.in

S. Kanmani Subbu

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Institute of Technology,
Warangal 506004, Telangana, India
e-mail: sksubbu@nitw.ac.in

M. J. Davidson

Department of Mechanical Engineering,
National Institute of Technology,
Warangal 506004, Telangana, India
e-mail: mjdavidson2001@yahoo.co.in

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received May 2, 2017; final manuscript received July 31, 2017; published online September 13, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Khaled Morsi.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 140(2), 021003 (Sep 13, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: MATS-17-1123; doi: 10.1115/1.4037660 History: Received May 02, 2017; Revised July 31, 2017

Grain size control of any engineering metal is very important in the hot upsetting process. Generally, the grain size directly controls the mechanical properties and performance of the material. Al–B4C composite finds extensive applications in nuclear industries, defense, and electronic industries. Therefore, the aim of this work is to study the dynamic recrystallization (DRX) behavior of Al–4 wt % B4C composite during the hot upsetting test. Experimental work was performed on sintered Al–4 wt % B4C preforms at various initial relative density (IRD) values of 80%, 85%, and 90%, and over the temperature range of 300–500 °C and strain rates range of 0.1–0.3 s−1. The DRXed grain size of Al–4 wt % B4C preforms for IRDes, and temperatures and strain rates were evaluated by using an optical microscope. The activation energy (Q) and Zener–Hollomon parameter of sintered Al–4 wt % B4C preforms were calculated for various deformation conditions and IRDes. The mathematical models of DRX were developed as a function of Zener–Hollomon parameter for various IRDes to predict the DRXed grain size. It was found that the DRXed grain size decreases with increasing Zener–Hollomon parameter. Verification tests were done between the measured and predicted DRXed grain size for various IRDes, and absolute and mean absolute error was found to be 9.92% and 8.58%, respectively.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Li, D. , Guo, Q. , Guo, S. , Peng, H. , and Wu, Z. , 2011, “ The Microstructure Evolution and Nucleation Mechanisms of Dynamic Recrystallization in Hot-Deformed Inconel 625 Superalloy,” Mater. Des., 32(2), pp. 696–705. [CrossRef]
Shaban, M. , and Eghbali, B. , 2011, “ Characterization of Austenite Dynamic Recrystallization Under Different Z Parameters in a Microalloyed Steel,” J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 27(4), pp. 359–363. [CrossRef]
Harrigan, W. C., Jr. , 1998, “ Commercial Processing of Metal Matrix Composites,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 244(1), pp. 75–79. [CrossRef]
Thevenot, T. , 1990, “ Boron Carbide—A Comprehensive Review,” J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 6(4), pp. 205–225. [CrossRef]
Nie, C. Z. , Gu, J. J. , Liu, J. L. , and Zhang, D. , 2007, “ Production of Boron Carbide Reinforced 2024 Aluminum Matrix Composites by Mechanical Alloying,” Mater. Trans., 48(5), pp. 990–995. [CrossRef]
Mohanty, R. M. , and Balasubramanian, K. , 2009, “ Boron Rich Boron Carbide: An Emerging High Performance Material,” Key Eng. Mater., 395, pp. 125–142. [CrossRef]
Abenojar, J. , Velasco, F. , and Martinez, M. A. , 2007, “ Optimization of Processing Parameters for the Al+10% B4C System Obtained by Mechanical Alloying,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 184(1–3), pp. 441–446. [CrossRef]
Chen, X. G. , St-Georges, L. , and Roux, M. , 2012, “ Mechanical Behavior of High Boron Content Al–B4C Metal Matrix Composites at Elevated Temperatures,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 706–709, pp. 631–637. [CrossRef]
Abouelmagd, G. , 2004, “ Hot Deformation and Wear Resistance of P/M Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 155–156, pp. 1395–1401. [CrossRef]
Cambronero, L. E. G. , Sanchez, E. , Ruiz-Roman, J. M. , and Ruiz-Prieto, J. M. , 2003, “ Mechanical Characterisation of AA7015 Aluminium Alloy Reinforced With Ceramics,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 143–144, pp. 378–383. [CrossRef]
Kodzhaspirov, G. E. , and Terentyev, M. I. , 2012, “ Modeling the Dynamically Recrystallized Grain Size Evolution of a Superalloy,” Mater. Phys. Mech., 13, pp. 70–76. http://www.ipme.ru/e-journals/MPM/no_11312/09_kodzhaspirov.pdf
Chen, X. M. , Lin, Y. C. , Wen, D. X. , Zhang, J. L. , and He, M. , 2014, “ Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior of a Typical Nickel-Based Superalloy During Hot Deformation,” Mater. Des., 57, pp. 568–577. [CrossRef]
Lin, Y. C. , Chen, X. M. , and Zhong, J. , 2008, “ Microstructural Evolution in 42CrMo Steel During Compression at Elevated Temperatures,” Mater. Lett., 62(14), pp. 2132–2135. [CrossRef]
Xu, S. W. , Matsumoto, N. , Kamado, S. , Honma, T. , and Kojima, Y. , 2009, “ Dynamic Microstructural Changes in Mg–9Al–1Zn Alloy During Hot Compression,” Scr. Mater., 61(3), pp. 249–252. [CrossRef]
Guo, Q. M. , Li, D. F. , and Guo, S. L. , 2012, “ Microstructural Models of Dynamic Recrystallization in Hot-Deformed Inconel 625 Superalloy,” Mater. Manuf. Processes, 27(9), pp. 990–995. [CrossRef]
Guo, Q. , Li, D. , Guo, S. , Peng, H. , and Hu, J. , 2011, “ The Effect of Deformation Temperature on the Microstructure Evolution of Inconel 625 Superalloy,” J. Nucl. Mater., 414(3), pp. 440–450. [CrossRef]
Chakravarthi, K. V. A. , Koundinya, N. T. B. N. , Murty, S. V. S. N. , and Rao, B. N. , 2017, “ Microstructural Evolution and Constitutive Relationship of M350 Grade Maraging Steel During Hot Deformation,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 26(3), pp. 1174–1185. [CrossRef]
Narayan, S. , and Rajeshkannan, A. , 2011, “ Densification Behaviour in Forming of Sintered Iron–0.35% Carbon Powder Metallurgy Preform During Cold Upsetting,” Mater. Des., 32(2), pp. 1006–1013. [CrossRef]
Narayanasamy, R. , Anandakrishnan, V. , and Pandey, K. S. , 2008, “ Effect of Geometric Work-Hardening and Matrix Work-Hardening on Workability and Densification of Aluminium–3.5% Alumina Composite During Cold Upsetting,” Mater. Des., 29(8), pp. 1582–1599. [CrossRef]
Venugopal, P. , Venkatraman, S. , Vasudeva, R. , and Padmanabhan, K. A. , 1988, “ Ring–Compression Tests on Sintered Iron Preforms,” J. Mech. Work. Technol., 16(1), pp. 51–64. [CrossRef]
Taleghani, M. A. J. , Navas, E. M. R. , Salehi, M. , and Torralba, J. M. , 2012, “ Hot Deformation Behaviour and Flow Stress Prediction of 7075 Aluminium Alloy Powder Compacts During Compression at Elevated Temperatures,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 534, pp. 624–631. [CrossRef]
Chen, X. M. , Lin, Y. C. , Chen, M. S. , Li, H. B. , Wena, D. X. , Zhang, J. L. , and He, M. , 2015, “ Microstructural Evolution of a Nickel-Based Superalloy During Hot Deformation,” Mater. Des., 77, pp. 41–49. [CrossRef]
Ren, F. , Chen, F. , and Chen, J. , 2014, “ Investigation on Dynamic Recrystallization Behavior of Martensitic Stainless Steel,” Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2014, p. 986928. [CrossRef]
Bedir, F. , 2013, “ Modeling Approach and Plastic Deformation Analysis of 6063 Aluminum Alloy During Compression at Elevated Temperatures,” Mater. Des., 49, pp. 953–956. [CrossRef]
Chen, F. , Cui, Z. , and Chen, S. , 2011, “ Recrystallization of 30Cr2Ni4MoV Ultra-Super-Critical Rotor Steel During Hot Deformation—Part I: Dynamic Recrystallization,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 528(15), pp. 5073–5080. [CrossRef]
Zhou, M. , Lin, Y. C. , Deng, J. , and Jiang, Y. Q. , 2014, “ Hot Tensile Deformation Behaviors and Constitutive Model of an Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloy,” Mater. Des., 59, pp. 141–150. [CrossRef]
Zhang, H. , Zhang, K. , Zhou, H. , Lu, Z. , Zhao, C. , and Yang, X. , 2015, “ Effect of Strain Rate on Microstructure Evolution of a Nickel-Based Superalloy During Hot Deformation,” Mater. Des., 80, pp. 51–62. [CrossRef]
Zener, C. , and Hollomon, J. H. , 1944, “ Effect of Strain Rate Upon Plastic Flow of Steel,” J. Appl. Phys., 15(1), pp. 22–32. [CrossRef]
Rokni, M. R. , Zarei-Hanzaki, A. , Roostaei, A. A. , and Abolhasani, A. , 2011, “ Constitutive Base Analysis of a 7075 Aluminum Alloy During Hot Compression Testing,” Mater. Des., 32(10), pp. 4955–4960. [CrossRef]
Gale, W. F. , and Totemeier, T. C. , eds., 2003, Smithells Metals Reference Book, Butterworth–Heinemann, Burlington, VT.
Matsui, T. , Takizawa, H. , Kikuchi, H. , and Wakita, S. , 2000, “ The Microstructure Prediction of Alloy 720LI for Turbine Disk Applications,” 9th International Symposium on Superalloys, Champion, PA, Sept. 9–13, pp. 127–133. http://www.tms.org/superalloys/10.7449/2000/Superalloys_2000_127_133.pdf

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scanning electron microscope image of (a) aluminum particles and (b) boron carbide particles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Experimental procedure for hot upsetting tests

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Microstructure of sintered Al–4 wt % B4C preforms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Initial microstructures of the sintered Al–4 wt % B4C preforms for different IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

True stress–true strain curves of Al–4 wt % B4C composite at various deformation conditions and IRDes of (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relationship between ln έ–ln σ of Al–4 wt % B4C composite with IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relationship between ln έ–σ of Al–4 wt % B4C composite with IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Correlation between ln έ–ln[sinh(ασ)] of Al–4 wt % B4C composite with IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Correlation between ln[sinh(ασ)]–1/T of Al–4 wt % B4C composite with IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Correlation between Zener–Hollomon parameters and average DRX grain size of P/M Al–4 wt % B4C composite for various IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Microstructures of Al–4 wt % B4C deformed preforms for 90% IRD and strain rate of 0.1 s−1 at different temperatures: (a) 300 °C, (b) 400 °C, and (c) 500 °C

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Microstructures of Al–4 wt % B4C deformed preforms for 90% IRD temperature of 500 °C at different strain rates: (a) 0.1 s−1, (b) 0.2 s−1, and (c) 0.3 s−1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Microstructures of Al–4 wt % B4C deformed preforms with constant temperature of 400 °C and strain rate 0.2 s−1 at different IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 95%

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Relationship between calculated and measured average DRX grain size of sintered Al–4 wt % B4C composite for different IRDes: (a) 80%, (b) 85%, and (c) 90%

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In