Research Papers

Constitutive Behavior for Quenching of Al–Cu–Mg Alloy With Consideration of Precipitation

[+] Author and Article Information
Jianjun Wu

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Northwestern Polytechnical University,
127 West Youyi Road,
Xi'an 710072, China
e-mail: wujj@nwpu.edu.cn

Ruichao Guo

School of Mechanical Engineering,
Northwestern Polytechnical University,
Xi'an 710072, China
e-mail: ytgrc@163.com

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Materials Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY. Manuscript received September 23, 2017; final manuscript received May 7, 2018; published online June 22, 2018. Assoc. Editor: Said Ahzi.

J. Eng. Mater. Technol 140(4), 041009 (Jun 22, 2018) (10 pages) Paper No: MATS-17-1279; doi: 10.1115/1.4040339 History: Received September 23, 2017; Revised May 07, 2018

The deformation behavior of as-quenched 2024 Al–Cu–Mg alloy has been experimentally studied. The experiments are designed to cool specimens to the desired temperature with a constant cooling rate, i.e., 5 K/s. Isothermal tensile tests are performed over a range of 573–723 K temperature and (0.01, 0.1, and 1 s−1) strain rates to find out the flow stresses and microstructures after deformation. Due to the nonuniform deformation mechanisms (solid solution versus solid solution and precipitation), two types of Arrhenius model are established for the temperature range of 573–673 K and 673–723 K, respectively. For temperature between 573 and 673 K, the activation energy is dependent on temperature and strain rate, and the value of activation energy decreases with the increases of temperature and strain rate. Compared with the ideal variation trend with no consideration of precipitation, the largest difference of activation energy is found at the temperature of 623 K which is the nose temperature of 2024 alloy.

Copyright © 2018 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Tolga, D. , and Soutis, C. , 2014, “ Recent Developments in Advanced Aircraft Aluminium Alloys,” Mater. Des., 56, pp. 862–871. [CrossRef]
Nikhin, M. , and Mudawar, I. , 2010, “ Analytical and Computational Methodology for Modeling Spray Quenching of Solid Alloy Cylinders,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 53(25–26), pp. 5871–5883.
Xiao, B. W. , Wang, Q. G. , Jadhav, P. , and Li, K. Y. , 2010, “ An Experimental Study of Heat Transfer in Aluminum Castings During Water Quenching,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 210(14), pp. 2023–2028. [CrossRef]
Chobaut, N. , Carron, D. , Arsene, S. , Schloth, P. , and Drezet, J. M. , 2015, “ Quench Induced Residual Stress Prediction in Heat Treatable 7xxx Aluminium Alloy Thick Plates Using Gleeble Interrupted Quench Tests,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 222, pp. 373–380. [CrossRef]
Chobaut, N. , 2015, “ Measurements and Modelling of Residual Stresses During Quenching of Thick Heat Treatable Aluminium Components in Relation to Their Precipitation State,” Ph.D. thesis, Swiss federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/205768?ln=en
Robinson, J. S. , Tanner, D. A. , and Truman, C. E. , 2014, “ 50th Anniversary Article: The Origin and Management of Residual Stress in Heat-Treatable Aluminum Alloys,” Strain, 50(3), pp. 185–207. [CrossRef]
Estey, C. M. , Cockcroft, S. L. , Maijer, D. M. , and Hermesmann, C. , 2004, “ Constitutive Behaviour of A356 During the Quenching Operation,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 383(2), pp. 245–251. [CrossRef]
Yang, X. W. , Lai, Z. H. , Zhu, J. C. , Liu, Y. , and He, D. , 2012, “ Hot Compressive Deformation Behavior of the As-Quenched A357 Aluminum Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng., B, 177(19), pp. 1721–1725. [CrossRef]
Yang, X. W. , Zhu, J. C. , Nong, Z. S. , Ye, M. , Lai, Z. H. , and Liu, Y. , 2013, “ Constitutive Behavior of As-Quenched Al–Cu–Mn Alloy,” Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 27(19), pp. 2252–2279.
Chobaut, N. , Carron, D. , and Drezet, J. M. , 2016, “ Characterisation of Precipitation Upon Cooling of an AA2618 Al–Cu–Mg Alloy,” J. Alloy Compd., 654, pp. 56–62. [CrossRef]
Wang, W. G. , Wang, G. , Hu, Y. S. , Guo, G. N. , Zhou, T. T. , and Rong, Y. M. , 2016, “ Temperature-Dependent Constitutive Behavior With Consideration of Microstructure Evolution for As-Quenched Al–Cu–Mn Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 678, pp. 85–92. [CrossRef]
Yang, B. , Milkereit, B. , Zhang, Y. , Rometsch, P. A. , Kessler, O. , and Schick, C. , 2016, “ Continuous Cooling Precipitation Diagram of Aluminium Alloy AA7150 Based on a New Fast Scanning Calorimetry and Interrupted Quenching Method,” Mater. Charact., 120, pp. 30–37. [CrossRef]
Milkereit, B. , Wanderka, N. , Schick, C. , and Kessler, O. , 2012, “ Continuous Cooling Precipitation Diagrams of Al–Mg–Si Alloys,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 550, pp. 87–96. [CrossRef]
Zhang, Y. , Milkereit, B. , Kessler, O. , Schick, C. , and Rometsch, P. A. , 2014, “ Development of Continuous Cooling Precipitation Diagrams for Aluminium Alloys AA7150 and AA7020,” J. Alloy Compd., 584, pp. 581–589. [CrossRef]
Schloth, P. , 2015, “ Precipitation in the High Strength AA7449 Aluminum Alloy: Implications on Internal Stresses on Different Length Scales,” Ph.D. thesis, Swiss federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, Switzerland. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/208831?ln=en
Vorster, W. J. J. , and Korsunsky, A. M. , 2009, “ Analysis of Residual Strain and Stress States Due to Heat Treatment and Thermal Processing,” J. Strain Anal. Eng., 44(1), pp. 71–91. [CrossRef]
Lin, Y. C. , and Chen, X. M. , 2011, “ A Critical Review of Experimental Results and Constitutive Descriptions for Metals and Alloys in Hot Working,” Mater. Des., 32(4), pp. 1733–1759. [CrossRef]
Fribourg, G. , 2009, “ Precipitation and Plasticity Couplings in a 7xxx Aluminum Alloy: Application to Thermo-Mechanical Treatments for Distortion Correction of Aerospace Components,” Ph.D. thesis, Institute National Polytechnique de Grenoble, France.
Afrin, N. , Chen, D. L. , Cao, X. , and Jahazi, M. , 2007, “ Strain Hardening Behavior of a Friction Stir Welded Magnesium Alloy,” Scr. Mater., 57(11), pp. 1004–1007. [CrossRef]
Chowdhury, S. M. , Chen, D. L. , Bhole, S. D. , Cao, X. , Powidajko, E. , Weckman, D. C. , and Zhou, Y. , 2010, “ Tensile Properties and Strain-Hardening Behavior of Double-Sided Arc Welded and Friction Stir Welded AZ31B Magnesium Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 527(12), pp. 2951–2961. [CrossRef]
Tahreen, N. , Chen, D. L. , Nouri, M. , and Li, D. Y. , 2014, “ Effects of Aluminum Content and Strain Rate on Strain Hardening Behavior of Cast Magnesium Alloys During Compression,” Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 594, pp. 235–245. [CrossRef]
Zener, C. , and Hollomon, H. , 1944, “ Effect of Strain Rate Upon Plastic Flow of Steel,” J. Appl. Phys., 15(1), pp. 22–32. [CrossRef]
Jonas, J. J. , Sellars, C. M. , and Tegart, W. J. M. , 1969, “ Strength and Structure Under Hot-Working Conditions,” Metall. Rev., 14(1), pp. 1–24.
Shi, H. , McLaren, A. J. , Sellars, C. M. , Shahani, R. , and Bolingbroke, R. , 1997, “ Constitutive Equations for High Temperature Flow Stress of Aluminium Alloys,” Mater. Sci. Technol., 13(3), pp. 210–216. [CrossRef]
Mcqueen, H. J. , and Ryan, N. D. , 2002, “ Constitutive Analysis in Hot Working,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 322(1–2), pp. 43–63. [CrossRef]
Shi, C. , Mao, W. , and Chen, X. G. , 2013, “ Evolution of Activation Energy During Hot Deformation of AA7150 Aluminum Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 571, pp. 83–91. [CrossRef]
Tiryakioglu, M. , and Shuey, R. T. , 2010, “ Modeling Quench Sensitivity of Aluminum Alloys for Multiple TEM PERS and Properties: Application to AA2024,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 41(11), pp. 2984–2991. [CrossRef]
Jin, N. P. , Zhang, H. , Han, Y. , Wu, W. X. , and Chen, J. H. , 2009, “ Huang: Hot Deformation Behavior of 7150 Aluminum Alloy During Compression at Elevated Temperature,” Mater. Charact., 60(6), pp. 530–536. [CrossRef]
Hull, D. , and Bacon, D. J. , 2011, Introduction to Dislocations, 5th ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 205–210. [CrossRef]
Wang, S. , Hou, L. G. , Luo, J. R. , Zhang, J. S. , and Zhuang, L. Z. , 2015, “ Characterization of Hot Workability in AA 7050 Aluminum Alloy Using Activation Energy and 3-D Processing Map,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., 225, pp. 110–121. [CrossRef]
Parel, T. S. , Wang, S. C. , and Starink, M. J. , 2010, “ Hardening of an Al–Cu–Mg Alloy Containing Types I and II S Phase Precipitates,” Mater. Des., 31, pp. S2–S5. [CrossRef]
Deschamps, A. , and Brechet, Y. , 1999, “ Influence of Pre-Deformation and Aging of an Al–Zn–Mg Alloy—II: Modeling of Precipitation Kinetics and Yield Stress,” Acta Metall., 1(1), pp. 293–305.
Leyson, G. , Hector , L., Jr. , and Curtin, W. , 2012, “ Solute Strengthening From First Principles and Application to Aluminum Alloys,” Acta Metall., 60(9), pp. 3873–3884.
Vegter, H. , Mulder, H. , Liempt, P. V. , and Heijne, J. , 2016, “ Work Hardening Descriptions in Simulation of Sheet Metal Forming Tailored to Material Type and Processing,” Int. J. Plast., 80, pp. 204–221. [CrossRef]
Schloth, P. , Menzel, A. , Fife, J. L. , Wagner, J. N. , Swygenhoven, H. V. , and Drezet, J. M. , 2015, “ Early Cluster Formation During Rapid Cooling of an Al–Cu–Mg Alloy: In Situ Small-Angle X-Ray Scattering,” Scr. Mater., 108, pp. 56–59. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

The dimensions of samples (unit: mm)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic diagram of thermal history used in present experiments

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Stress–strain curves of as-quenched 2024 alloy with different temperature and strain rates: (a) 573 K and 0.01–1 s−1; (b) 623 K and 0.01–1 s−1; (c) 673 K and 0.01–1 s−1; and (d) 723 K and 0.01–1 s−1

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Deformation behavior of (a) strain hardening and (b) SRS for as-quenched Al–Cu–Mg alloy at different temperatures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Relationships of (a) ln ε˙ − ln(sinh(ασ)), (b) ln(sinh(ασ)) − 1/T at 573–673 K, (c) ln ε˙ − ln (sinh (ασ)), and (d) ln (sinh (ασ)) − 1/T at 673 − 723 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Comparison of the flow stress between (a) experimental results and (b) predicted results at different conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Relationship between ln Z and ln[sinh (ασ)]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Evolution of total activation energy and activation energy of solid solution stress from 573 to 673 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Relationships between (a) η − T, (b) S − ln ε˙, and (c) (T,ε˙) − lnA3

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Evolution of activation energy from 573 to 673 K

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

A comparison of the evolution of activation energy between (a) present results and (b) Shi's results in Ref. [26]

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

TEM micrographs of 2024 alloy at a cooling rate of 5 K s−1 to 623 K: bright field images and its corresponding EDX analysis



Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In