Accurate gas turbine performance models are crucial in many gas turbine performance analysis and gas path diagnostic applications. With current thermodynamic performance modeling techniques, the accuracy of gas turbine performance models at off-design conditions is determined by engine component characteristic maps obtained in rig tests and these maps may not be available to gas turbine users or may not be accurate for individual engines. In this paper, a nonlinear multiple point performance adaptation approach using a genetic algorithm is introduced with the aim to improve the performance prediction accuracy of gas turbine engines at different off-design conditions by calibrating the engine performance models against available test data. Such calibration is carried out with introduced nonlinear map scaling factor functions by “modifying” initially implemented component characteristic maps in the gas turbine thermodynamic performance models. A genetic algorithm is used to search for an optimal set of nonlinear scaling factor functions for the maps via an objective function that measures the difference between the simulated and actual gas path measurements. The developed off-design performance adaptation approach has been applied to a model single spool turbo-shaft aero gas turbine engine and has demonstrated a significant improvement in the performance model accuracy at off-design operating conditions.

1.
Stamatis
,
A.
,
Mathioudakis
,
K.
, and
Papailiou
,
K. D.
, 1990, “
Adaptive Simulation of Gas Turbine Performance
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
112
(
2
), pp.
168
175
.
2.
Lambiris
,
B.
,
Mathioudakis
,
K.
, and
Papailiou
,
K. D.
, 1991, “
Adaptive Modeling of Jet Engine Performance With Application to Condition Monitoring
,” ISABE Paper No. 91-7058.
3.
Kong
,
C. D.
, and
Ki
,
J. Y.
, 2003, “
A New Scaling Method for Component Maps of Gas Turbine Using System Identification
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
125
(
4
), pp.
979
985
.
4.
Kong
,
C.
,
Kho
,
S.
, and
Ki
,
J.
, 2004, “
Component Map Generation for a Gas Turbine Using Genetic Algorithms
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53736.
5.
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Pilidis
,
P.
, and
Newby
,
M.
, 2006, “
An Adaptation Approach for Gas Turbine Design-Point Performance Simulation
,”
Trans. ASME: J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
128
, pp.
789
795
.
6.
Roth
,
B. R.
,
Mavris
,
D.
,
Doel
,
D. L.
, and
Beeson
,
D.
, 2004, “
High-Accuracy Matching of Engine Performance Models to Test Data
,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38784.
7.
Roth
,
B. A.
,
Doel
,
D. L.
, and
Cissell
,
J. J.
, 2005, “
Probabilistic Matching of Turbofan Engine Performance Models to Test Data
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68201.
8.
Lo Gatto
,
E.
,
Li
,
Y. G.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
, 2006, “
Gas Turbine Off-Design Performance Adaptation Using Genetic Algorithm
,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90299.
9.
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Marinai
,
L.
,
Lo Gatto
,
E.
,
Pachidis
,
V.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
, 2009, “
Multiple Point Adaptive Performance Simulation Tuned to Aerospace Test-Bed Data
,”
J. Propul. Power
0748-4658,
25
(
3
), pp.
635
641
.
10.
Wang
,
L.
,
Li
,
Y. G.
,
Huang
,
K.
, and
Feng
,
X.
, 2009, “
Gas Turbine Off-Design Performance Model Improvement for Diagnostics
,”
The Sixth International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Machinery Failure Prevention Technologies
, Paper No. CM-MFPT-0149-2009.
11.
Li
,
Y. G.
, and
Singh
,
R.
, 2005, “
An Advanced Gas Turbine Gas Path Diagnostic System—PYTHIA
,”
XVII International Symposium on Air Breathing Engines
, Munich, Germany, Paper No. ISABE-2005-1284.
12.
Li
,
Y. G.
, and
Pilidis
,
P.
, 2010, “
GA-Based Design-Point Performance Adaptation and Its Comparison With ICM-Based Approach
,”
Appl. Energy
0306-2619,
87
, pp.
340
348
.
You do not currently have access to this content.