Shock vector controlling (SVC) nozzle, based on confined transverse injection and shock wave/boundary layer interaction, offers an alternative for future aircraft thrust vectoring (TV) exhausting system, due to its simple structure, low weight, and quick vector response. In the paper, the flow mechanism of SVC nozzle was studied by numerical simulation after the validation of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models was confirmed. Then, the influence of substantial affecting factors, including injection configurations and injection angles, on the confined transverse injection flowfield characteristics and vector performance was investigated numerically. The results show that the “λ” shock wave induced by the jet injection causes unbalanced side force for the primary flow deflecting, and under larger secondary pressure ratio (SPR), the induced shock wave interacts with upper wall, weakening the thrust vector efficiency; with the increase of injection orifice numbers, the vector angle of SVC nozzle rises and is less than that of slot injection configuration; under smaller SPR, the thrust vector angle increases with the injection angle. For the case of SPR = 1.0 and 1.2, there exist optimal injection angles at which the maximum TV angle achieved.

References

1.
Nguyen
,
L. T.
, and
Gilbert
,
W. P.
,
1990
, “
Impact of Emerging Technologies on Future Combat Aircraft Agility
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 90-1304.
2.
Bitten
,
R.
, and
Selmen
,
J.
,
1992
, “
Operational Benefits of Thrust Vector Control (TVC)
,”
High-Angle-Attack Technology
, Vol.
1
, pp.
587
601
.
3.
Mason
,
M. S.
, and
Crowther
,
W. J.
,
2004
, “
Fluidic Thrust Vectoring for Low Observable Air Vehicle
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-2210.
4.
Weber
,
Y. S.
, and
Bowers
,
D. L.
,
1998
, “
Advancements in Exhaust System Technology for the 21st Century
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 98-3100.
5.
Deere
,
K. A.
,
2003
, “
Summary of Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Research Conducted at NASA Langley Research Center
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2003-3800.
6.
Mich
,
T.
,
1967
, “
Proportional Solid Propellant Secondary Injection Thrust Vector Control Study
,”
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
,
Washington, DC
, Report No. NASA CR-637.
7.
Wilson
,
W. G.
, and
Comparin
,
R. A.
,
1969
, “
An Analysis of the Flow Disturbance and Side Forces Due to Gaseous Secondary Injection Into a Rocket Nozzle
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 69-443.
8.
Chiarelli
,
C.
, and
Raymond
,
K.
,
1993
, “
Fluidic Scale Model Multi-Plane Thrust Vector Control Test Results
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 93-2433.
9.
Wing
,
D. J.
,
1994
, “
Static Investigation of Two Fluidic Thrust Vectoring Concepts on a Two-Dimensional Convergent-Divergent Nozzle
,” NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, Report No.
NASA
TM-4574.
10.
Giuliano
, V
. J.
,
Flugsrad
,
T. H.
, and
Wing
,
D. J.
,
1994
, “
Static Investigation and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Analysis of Flow Path Cross-Section and Trailing-Edge Shape Variations in to Multi-Axis Thrust Vectoring Nozzle Concepts
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 94-3367.
11.
Federspiel
,
J.
, and
Bangert
,
L.
,
1995
, “
Fluidic Control of Nozzle Flow-Some Performance Measurements
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 95-2605.
12.
Anderson
,
C. J.
,
Giuliano
, V
. J.
, and
Wing
,
D. J.
,
1997
, “
Investigation of Hybrid Fluidic/Mechanical Thrust Vectoring for Fixed Exit Exhaust Nozzle
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 97-3148.
13.
Deere
,
K. A.
,
2000
, “
Computational Investigation of the Aerodynamic Effects on Fluidic Thrust Vectoring
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2000-3598.
14.
Guo
,
F.-F.
,
Wang
,
R.-G.
, and
Zhao
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Effect of Variable Specific Heat on Shock Vectoring Nozzle
,”
J. Air Force Eng. Univ.
,
12
(
5
), pp.
15
19
.
15.
Kenrick
,
A. W.
, and
Deere
,
K. A.
,
2003
, “
Experimental and Computational Investigation of Multiple Injection Ports in a Convergent-Divergent Nozzle for Fluidic Thrust Vectoring
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2003-3802.
16.
Wang
,
Z.-X.
,
Wang
,
Y.-N.
,
Li
,
Z.-J.
, and
Xin
,
X.-L.
,
2011
, “
Experimental on Fluidic Thrust-Vectoring Nozzle Based on Shock Control Concept
,”
J. Propul. Technol.
,
31
(
6
), pp.
751
756
.
17.
Sriram
,
A. T.
, and
Mathew
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Numerical Prediction of Two-Dimensional Transverse Injection Flows
,”
AIAA
Paper No. 2004-1099.
18.
Spaid
,
F. W.
, and
Zukoshi
,
E. E.
,
1968
, “
A Study of the Interaction of Gaseous Jets From Transverse Slot With Supersonic External Flows
,”
AIAA J.
,
6
(
2
), pp.
205
212
.
19.
Friddell
,
J. H.
, and
Franke
,
M. E.
,
1992
, “
Confined Jet Thrust Vector Control Nozzle Studies
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
8
(
6
), pp.
1239
1242
.
20.
Gruber
,
M. R.
,
Nejad
,
A. S.
,
Chen
,
T. H.
, and
Dutton
,
J. C.
,
1995
, “
Mixing and Penetration Studies of Sonic Jets in a Mach 2 Free Stream
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
11
(
2
), pp.
315
323
.
21.
Fric
,
T. F.
, and
Roshko
,
A.
,
1994
, “
Vortical Structure in the Wake of a Transvers Jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
,
279
(
10
), pp.
1
47
.
22.
Hassan
,
E.
,
Bobes
,
J.
,
Aono
,
H.
,
Davis
,
D.
, and
Shyy
,
W.
,
2013
, “
Supersonic Jet and Cross Flow Interaction: Computational Modeling
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
57
, pp.
1
24
.
You do not currently have access to this content.