Abstract

Hackathons are intensive design experiences during which teams identify a problem and rapidly develop prototypes of solutions. These events offer a promising venue for studying collaborative design: they are naturalistic, short term, and contained, which mitigates many of the drawbacks of traditional investigations in design research. The objective of this technical brief is to present and describe a transcript dataset of conversations collected from a hackathon team. The dataset includes a transcript of the verbal communication between a four-person hackathon team in the first 2 hours and 9 min of their collaboration. This portion of the design process, totaling 908 segments of speech, details the team’s problem exploration, brainstorming, idea selection, and premature team dissolution. This brief outlines the advantages of having rich transcript data freely available, with a specific focus on new research directions and impact. We include a qualitative analysis of the premature team dissolution, using inductive coding to explore goal misalignment, to provide further context of the collaboration captured in the transcript. We aim for this brief to encourage the use of these data for future investigations of design, teamwork, and hackathon phenomena, as well as act as an exemplar for future publications of open-access datasets.

References

1.
Pahl
,
G.
, and
Beitz
,
W.
,
2013
,
Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach
,
Springer Science & Business Media
,
Berlin
.
2.
Cross
,
N.
,
1993
, “A History of Design Methodology,”
Design Methodology and Relationships With Science
,
M. J.
de Vries
,
N.
Cross
, and
D. P.
Grant
, eds.,
Springer Science & Business Media
,
Berlin
, pp.
15
27
.
3.
Blessing
,
L.
, and
Chakrabarti
,
A.
,
2009
,
DRM, a Design Research MethodologyBook
,
Springer
,
New York
.
4.
Panchal
,
J. H.
, and
Szajnfarber
,
Z.
,
2017
, “
Experiments in Systems Engineering and Design Research
,”
Syst. Eng.
,
20
(
6
), pp.
529
541
.
5.
Flus
,
M.
, and
Hurst
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Design at Hackathons: New Opportunities for Design Research
,”
Des. Sci.
,
7
(
e4
).
6.
Falk Olesen
,
J.
, and
Halskov
,
K.
,
2020
, “
10 Years of Research With and on Hackathons
,”
Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
,
Eindhoven, Netherlands
,
July 6–10
, pp.
1073
1088
.
7.
Falk
,
J.
,
Nolte
,
A.
,
Huppenkothen
,
D.
,
Weinzierl
,
M.
,
Gama
,
K.
,
Spikol
,
D.
,
Tollerud
,
E.
,
Hong
,
N. C.
,
Knäpper
,
I.
, and
Hayden
,
L. B.
,
2024
, “
The Future of Hackathon Research and Practice
,”
IEEE Access
,
12
, pp.
133406
133425
.
8.
Gama
,
K.
,
2019
, “
Developing Course Projects in a Hack Day: An Experience Report
,”
Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education
,
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
,
July 15–17
, pp.
388
394
.
9.
Chandrasegaran
,
S.
,
Salah
,
A. A.
, and
Lloyd
,
P.
,
2023
, “
Constructing Design Activity in Words: Exploring Linguistic Methods to Analyse the Design Process
,”
Des. Stud.
,
86
.
10.
Lloyd
,
P.
,
McDonnell
,
J.
, and
Cross
,
N.
,
2007
,
Analysing Design Behaviour: The Design Thinking Research Symposia Series
,
IASDR07: International Association of Design Research Societies
,
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
.
11.
Cross
,
N.
,
2018
, “
A Brief History of the Design Thinking Research Symposium Series
,”
Des. Stud.
,
57
(
1
), pp.
160
164
.
12.
Briscoe
,
G.
, and
Mulligan
,
C.
,
2014
, “Digital Innovation: The Hackathon Phenomenon.”
13.
Oremus
,
W.
,
2022
, “How Facebook Designed the Like Button—And Made Social Media Into a Popularity Contest,” https://www.fastcompany.com/90780140/the-inside-story-of-how-facebook-designedthe-like-button-and-made-social-media-into-a-popularity-contest
14.
Whereabouts of 8 Abducted Ukrainian Kids Traced in Hackathon Organized by Dutch Police j NL Times, https://nltimes.nl/2024/02/09/whereabouts-8-abducted-ukrainian-kids-traced-hackathon-organized-dutch-police
15.
Flus
,
M.
, and
Hurst
,
A.
,
2021
, “
Experiences of Design at Hackathons: Initial Findings From an Interview Study
,”
Proc. Des. Soc.
,
1
, pp.
1461
1470
.
16.
Salas
,
E.
,
Dickinson
,
T. L.
,
Converse
,
S. A.
, and
Tannenbaum
,
S. I.
,
1992
, “Toward an Understanding of Team Performance and Training,”
Teams: Their Training and Performance
,
R. W.
Swezey
and
E.
Salas
, eds.,
Ablex Publishing
,
New York
, pp.
3
29
.
17.
Larson
,
C. E.
, and
LaFasto
,
F. M. J.
,
1989
,
Teamwork: What Must Go Right/What Can Go Wrong
,
Sage Publications, Inc
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
, pp.
1
150
.
18.
Wageman
,
R.
,
1997
, “
Critical Success Factors for Creating Superb Self-Managing Teams
,”
Organ. Dyn.
,
26
(
1
), pp.
49
61
.
19.
Kos
,
B. A.
,
2019
, “
Understanding Female-Focused Hackathon Participants’ Collaboration Styles and Event Goals
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Game Jams, Hackathons and Game Creation Events 2019, ICGJ ’19
,
San Francisco, CA
,
Mar. 16–17
,
Association for Computing Machinery
, pp.
1
4
.
20.
Henderson
,
S.
,
2015
, “Getting the Most Out of Hackathons for Social Good,”
Volunteer ENGAGEMENT 2.0: Ideas and Insights Changing the World
,
R. J.
Rosenthal
, ed.,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
Hoboken, NJ
, pp.
182
194
.
21.
Meriläinen
,
M.
,
Aurava
,
R.
,
Kultima
,
A.
, and
Stenros
,
J.
,
2020
, “
Game Jams for Learning and Teaching: A Review
,”
Int. J. Game-Based Learn. (IJGBL)
,
10
(
2
), pp.
54
71
.
22.
Goddard
,
W.
,
Byrne
,
R.
, and
Mueller
,
F.
,
2014
, “
Playful Game Jams: Guidelines for Designed Outcomes
,”
Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Interactive Entertainment
,
Newcastle, NSW, Australia
,
Dec. 2–3
, pp.
1
10
.
23.
Imam
,
A.
, and
Dey
,
T.
,
2021
, “
Tracking Hackathon Code Creation and Reuse
,”
2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)
,
Madrid, Spain
,
May 17–19
,
IEEE
, pp.
615
617
.
24.
Imam
,
A.
,
Dey
,
T.
,
Nolte
,
A.
,
Mockus
,
A.
, and
Herbsleb
,
J. D.
,
2021
, “
The Secret Life of Hackathon Code Where Does It Come From and Where Does It Go?
2021 IEEE/ACM 18th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)
,
Madrid, Spain
,
May 17–19
,
IEEE
, pp.
68
79
.
25.
Zimmerer
,
C.
, and
Matthiesen
,
S.
,
2021
, “
Study on the Impact of Cognitive Load on Performance in Engineering Design
,”
Proc. Des. Soc.
,
1
, pp.
2761
2770
.
26.
Tsenn
,
J.
,
Atilola
,
O.
,
McAdams
,
D. A.
, and
Linsey
,
J. S.
,
2014
, “
The Effects of Time and Incubation on Design Concept Generation
,”
Des. Stud.
,
35
(
5
), pp.
500
526
.
27.
Cardoso
,
C. C.
, and
Badke-Schaub
,
P.
,
2009
, “
Give Design a Break? The Role of Incubation Periods During Idea Generation
,” DS 58-2: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Palo Alto, CA, Aug. 24–27, pp.
383
394
, Vol. 2, Design Theory and Research Methodology.
28.
Nickel
,
J.
,
Duimering
,
P. R.
, and
Hurst
,
A.
,
2022
, “
Manipulating the Design Space to Resolve Trade-Offs: Theory and Evidence
,”
Des. Stud.
,
79
.
29.
Sutton
,
R. I.
, and
Hargadon
,
A.
,
1996
,
Brainstorming Groups in Context: Effectiveness in a Product Design Firm
,
Sage Publications, Inc
.,
Thousand Oaks, CA
, pp.
685
718
.
30.
Weick
,
K. E.
,
1992
,
Agenda Setting in Organizational Behavior: A Theory-Focused Approach
,
SAGE Publications Inc.
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
, pp.
171
182
.
31.
Ericsson
,
K. A.
,
2017
, “Protocol Analysis,”
A Companion to Cognitive Science
,
W.
Bechtel
and
G.
Graham
, eds.,
Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
,
Oxford, UK
, pp.
425
432
.
32.
Hay
,
L.
,
Cash
,
P.
, and
McKilligan
,
S.
,
2020
,
The Future of Design Cognition Analysis
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
33.
Babbie
,
E.
, and
Roberts
,
L. W.
,
2018
,
Fundamentals of Social Research
, 4th ed.,
Nelson Education Ltd
,
Toronto
.
34.
Salas
,
E.
,
Reyes
,
D. L.
, and
McDaniel
,
S. H.
,
2018
,
The Science of Teamwork: Progress, Reflections, and the Road Ahead
,
American Psychological Association
,
WA
, pp.
593
600
.
35.
Flus
,
M.
,
Litster
,
G.
, and
Olechowski
,
A.
,
2025
, “Hackathon Archive of Collaboration Knowledge and Engineering Design (HACKED): Hackathon 1 Transcript Sample,”
Borealis, V1
.
36.
Miles
,
M. B.
, and
Huberman
,
A. M.
,
1994
,
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
,
SAGE
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
.
37.
Thomas
,
D. R.
,
2006
,
A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data
,
SAGE Publications Inc.
,
Thousand Oaks, CA
, pp.
237
246
.
38.
Cabello
,
F.
,
2002
, “
Addressing the Limitations of Protocol Analysis in the Study of Complex Human Behavior
,”
Int. J. Psychol. Psychol. Therapy
,
2
(
2
), pp.
115
130
.
39.
Wilkinson
,
M. D.
,
Dumontier
,
M.
,
Aalbersberg
,
I. J.
,
Appleton
,
G.
,
Axton
,
M.
,
Baak
,
A.
, and
Blomberg
,
N.
,
2016
, “
The Fair Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship
,”
Sci. Data
,
3
(
1
), pp.
1
9
.
You do not currently have access to this content.