The dynamic vibration absorber (DVA) is a passive vibration control device which is attached to a vibrating body (called a primary system) subjected to exciting force or motion. In this paper, we will discuss an optimization problem of the three-element type DVA on the basis of the H2 optimization criterion. The objective of the H2 optimization is to reduce the total vibration energy of the system for overall frequencies; the total area under the power spectrum response curve is minimized in this criterion. If the system is subjected to random excitation instead of sinusoidal excitation, then the H2 optimization is probably more desirable than the popular H optimization. In the past decade there has been increasing interest in the three-element type DVA. However, most previous studies on this type of DVA were based on the H optimization design, and no one has been able to find the algebraic solution as of yet. We found a closed-form exact solution for a special case where the primary system has no damping. Furthermore, the general case solution including the damped primary system is presented in the form of a numerical solution. The optimum parameters obtained here are compared to those of the conventional Voigt type DVA. They are also compared to other optimum parameters based on the H criterion.

1.
Asami
,
T.
,
Nishihara
,
O.
, and
Baz
,
A. M.
,
2002
, “
Analytical Solutions to H∞ and H2 Optimization of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers Attached to Damped Linear Systems
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
124
(
2
), pp.
284
295
.
2.
Ormondroyd
,
J.
, and
Den Hartog
,
J. P.
,
1928
, “
The Theory of the Dynamic Vibration Absorber
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
50
(
7
), pp.
9
22
.
3.
Crandall, S. H., and Mark, W. D., 1963, Random Vibration in Mechanical Systems, Academic Press.
4.
Yamaguchi
,
H.
,
1988
, “
Damping of Transient Vibration by a Dynamic Absorber
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C
,
54
(
499
), Ser C, pp.
561
568
(in Japanese).
5.
Satoh
,
Y.
,
1991
, “
The Reductive Performance of the Dynamic Absorbers and Dynamic Properties of the Viscoelastic Absorber Elements
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C
,
57
(
534
), Ser C, pp.
446
452
(in Japanese).
6.
Asami
,
T.
, and
Nishihara
,
O.
,
1999
, “
Analytical and Experimental Evaluation of an Air Damped Dynamic Vibration Absorber: Design Optimizations of the Three-Element Type Model
,”
ASME J. Vibr. Acoust.
,
121
(
3
), pp.
334
342
.
7.
Gatade, Y., Misawa, H., Seto, K., and Doi, F., 1996, “Optimal Design of Notch Type Dynamic Absorber,” Prepr. of Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., No. 95-5(I), Vol. B, pp. 569–572 (in Japanese).
8.
Kawashima
,
T.
,
1992
, “
Vibration Prevention by a Three-Element Dynamic Vibration Absorber
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. C
,
58
(
548
548
), Ser C, pp. 1024–1029 (in Japanese).
9.
Kreyszig, E., 1999, Advanced Engineering Mathematics, 8th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
10.
Warburton
,
G. B.
,
1982
, “
Optimum Absorber Parameters for Various Combinations of Response and Excitation Parameters
,”
Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn.
,
10
, pp.
381
401
.
11.
Kowalik, J., and Osborne, M. R., 1968, Methods for Unconstrained Optimization Problems, American Elsevier Publishing Company.
You do not currently have access to this content.